These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25577730)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of graft fixation at 30° and 90° of elbow flexion for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction by the docking technique.
    Cohen SB; Woods DP; Siegler S; Dodson CC; Namani R; Ciccotti MG
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Feb; 24(2):265-72. PubMed ID: 25577730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With the Docking Technique Versus Repair With Internal Bracing.
    Bodendorfer BM; Looney AM; Lipkin SL; Nolton EC; Li J; Najarian RG; Chang ES
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Dec; 46(14):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 30403369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Restoration of the Ulnar Footprint vs Traditional Ulnar Tunnels in Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
    Chang ES; Le AH; Looney AM; Colantonio DF; Roach WB; Helgeson MD; Clark DM; Fredericks DR; Nagda SH
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Apr; 50(5):1375-1381. PubMed ID: 34889687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using bisuspensory fixation: a biomechanical comparison with the docking technique.
    Jackson TJ; Adamson GJ; Peterson A; Patton J; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1158-64. PubMed ID: 23548807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques.
    Ruland RT; Hogan CJ; Randall CJ; Richards A; Belkoff SM
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Aug; 36(8):1565-70. PubMed ID: 18596198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation.
    Narvaez MV; Nelson TJ; Youssefzadeh K; Limpisvasti O; Metzger MF
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Jul; 50(9):2508-2514. PubMed ID: 35722811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of the TightRope versus traditional docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique: kinematic and failure testing.
    Lynch JL; Maerz T; Kurdziel MD; Davidson AA; Baker KC; Anderson K
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1165-73. PubMed ID: 23636555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical comparison of 2 hybrid techniques for elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.
    Chronister JE; Morris RP; Andersen CR; Buford WL; Bennett JM; Mehlhoff TL
    J Hand Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 39(10):2033-40. PubMed ID: 25194771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical evaluation of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a novel technique for ulnar-sided fixation.
    Morgan RJ; Starman JS; Habet NA; Peindl RD; Bankston LS; D'Alessandro DD; Connor PM; Fleischli JE
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jul; 38(7):1448-55. PubMed ID: 20442324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomic and Biomechanical Evaluation of Ulnar Tunnel Position in Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
    Dutton PH; Banffy MB; Nelson TJ; Metzger MF
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Dec; 47(14):3491-3497. PubMed ID: 31647881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical assessment of docking ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction after failed ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture augmentation.
    Itami Y; Mihata T; McGarry MH; Lin CC; Patel NA; Kantor AH; Hasegawa A; Neo M; Lee TQ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1477-1486. PubMed ID: 33276162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The biomechanical evaluation of a novel 3-strand docking technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in the elbow.
    Williams PN; McGarry MH; Ihn H; Schulz BM; Limpisvasti O; ElAttrache NS; Lee TQ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1672-1678. PubMed ID: 29748121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The GraftLink ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison with the docking technique in both kinematics and failure tests.
    Lynch JL; Pifer MA; Maerz T; Kurdziel MD; Davidson AA; Baker KC; Anderson K
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Oct; 41(10):2278-87. PubMed ID: 23940203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the biomechanical profile of the intact ulnar collateral ligament with the modified Jobe and the Docking reconstructed elbow: an in vitro study.
    Ciccotti MG; Siegler S; Kuri JA; Thinnes JH; Murphy DJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 May; 37(5):974-81. PubMed ID: 19270190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique and the Docking Technique for Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.
    Meyers KN; Middleton KK; Fu MC; Dines JS
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 Mar; 50(4):1061-1065. PubMed ID: 35188812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revision ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction using a suspension button fixation technique.
    Lee GH; Limpisvasti O; Park MC; McGarry MH; Yocum LA; Lee TQ
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):575-80. PubMed ID: 20028848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of the docking plus ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction technique compared with the docking technique.
    McGraw MA; Kremchek TE; Hooks TR; Papangelou C
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 23193145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction methods: the docking technique versus bioabsorbable interference screw fixation--a biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading.
    McAdams TR; Lee AT; Centeno J; Giori NJ; Lindsey DP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2007; 16(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 17254812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biomechanical comparison of 2 ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques.
    Large TM; Coley ER; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Feb; 23(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 17276221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of 2 techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow.
    Paletta GA; Klepps SJ; Difelice GS; Allen T; Brodt MD; Burns ME; Silva MJ; Wright RW
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Oct; 34(10):1599-603. PubMed ID: 16861581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.