167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25578934)
1. Upgrading and upstaging of low-risk prostate cancer among Korean patients: a multicenter study.
Hwang I; Lim D; Jeong YB; Park SC; Noh JH; Kwon DD; Kang TW
Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(5):811-4. PubMed ID: 25578934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in Korean patients with serum PSA ranges.
Lee HW; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Lee HM
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Mar; 30(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25729256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Gao Y; Jiang CY; Mao SK; Cui D; Hao KY; Zhao W; Jiang Q; Ruan Y; Xia SJ; Han BM
Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(4):639-43. PubMed ID: 26732103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.
Tilki D; Schlenker B; John M; Buchner A; Stanislaus P; Gratzke C; Karl A; Tan GY; Ergün S; Tewari AK; Stief CG; Seitz M; Reich O
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 19837614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detailed biopsy pathologic features as predictive factors for initial reclassification in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Terry S; Allory Y; Ouzaïd I; Vacherot F; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1060-6. PubMed ID: 22300755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of unfavorable disease after radical prostatectomy in patients at low risk by D'Amico criteria: role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Song SH; Pak S; Park S; Song C; Jeong IG; Choi HJ; Kim JK; Cho KS; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2014 Aug; 192(2):402-8. PubMed ID: 24631106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Higher rates of upgrading and upstaging in older patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and qualifying for active surveillance.
Busch J; Magheli A; Leva N; Ferrari M; Kramer J; Klopf C; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Brooks JD; Gonzalgo ML
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 24112652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
Dinh KT; Mahal BA; Ziehr DR; Muralidhar V; Chen YW; Viswanathan VB; Nezolosky MD; Beard CJ; Choueiri TK; Martin NE; Orio PF; Sweeney CJ; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 25681290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading.
Dong F; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Magi-Galluzzi C; Reuther AM; Klein EA
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):896-900; discussion 900. PubMed ID: 18207180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Liu H; Tang K; Xia D; Peng E; Wang L; Chen Z
Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153235. PubMed ID: 33035728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical prostatectomy in men aged >or=70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram.
Richstone L; Bianco FJ; Shah HH; Kattan MW; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Scherr DS
BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18257855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
Leeman JE; Chen MH; Huland H; Graefen M; D'Amico AV; Tilki D
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Dec; 17(6):e1116-e1121. PubMed ID: 31601512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of Pathologic Upgrading or Locally Advanced Disease in Early Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Biopsy Gleason Score and PSA: A Population-Based Study of Modern Patients.
Caster JM; Falchook AD; Hendrix LH; Chen RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 25841621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delay from biopsy to radical prostatectomy influences the rate of adverse pathologic outcomes.
Berg WT; Danzig MR; Pak JS; Korets R; RoyChoudhury A; Hruby G; Benson MC; McKiernan JM; Badani KK
Prostate; 2015 Jul; 75(10):1085-91. PubMed ID: 25809289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the Time Interval from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Affect the Postoperative Oncologic Outcomes in Korean Men?
Kim SJ; Ryu JH; Yang SO; Lee JK; Jung TY; Kim YB
J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Sep; 34(37):e234. PubMed ID: 31559708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
