139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25579635)
1. A spline-based tool to assess and visualize the calibration of multiclass risk predictions.
Van Hoorde K; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Apr; 54():283-93. PubMed ID: 25579635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models.
Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2585-96. PubMed ID: 24549725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiclass risk models for ovarian malignancy: an illustration of prediction uncertainty due to the choice of algorithm.
Ledger A; Ceusters J; Valentin L; Testa A; Van Holsbeke C; Franchi D; Bourne T; Froyman W; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):276. PubMed ID: 38001421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A discussion of calibration techniques for evaluating binary and categorical predictive models.
Fenlon C; O'Grady L; Doherty ML; Dunnion J
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Jan; 149():107-114. PubMed ID: 29290291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models.
Van Calster B; Valentin L; Van Holsbeke C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Oct; 10():96. PubMed ID: 20961457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory.
Kruppa J; Liu Y; Biau G; Kohler M; König IR; Malley JD; Ziegler A
Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):534-63. PubMed ID: 24478134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and related metrics for quantifying the calibration of logistic regression models.
Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):4051-4065. PubMed ID: 31270850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consistency of variety of machine learning and statistical models in predicting clinical risks of individual patients: longitudinal cohort study using cardiovascular disease as exemplar.
Li Y; Sperrin M; Ashcroft DM; van Staa TP
BMJ; 2020 Nov; 371():m3919. PubMed ID: 33148619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial Intelligence in Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis.
Akazawa M; Hashimoto K
Anticancer Res; 2020 Aug; 40(8):4795-4800. PubMed ID: 32727807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A decision support system to facilitate management of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.
Chu A; Ahn H; Halwan B; Kalmin B; Artifon EL; Barkun A; Lagoudakis MG; Kumar A
Artif Intell Med; 2008 Mar; 42(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 18063351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calibration Drift Among Regression and Machine Learning Models for Hospital Mortality.
Davis SE; Lasko TA; Chen G; Matheny ME
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():625-634. PubMed ID: 29854127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving calibration of logistic regression models by local estimates.
Osl M; Ohno-Machado L; Baumgartner C; Tilg B; Dreiseitl S
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; 2008():535-9. PubMed ID: 18998878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Probability calibration-based prediction of recurrence rate in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Fan S; Zhao Z; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zheng C; Huang X; Yang Z; Xing M; Lu Q; Luo Y
BioData Min; 2021 Aug; 14(1):38. PubMed ID: 34389029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new calibration test and a reappraisal of the calibration belt for the assessment of prediction models based on dichotomous outcomes.
Nattino G; Finazzi S; Bertolini G
Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(14):2390-407. PubMed ID: 24497413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Mortality 100 Days After Transplantation Using a Machine Learning Algorithm: A European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Acute Leukemia Working Party Retrospective Data Mining Study.
Shouval R; Labopin M; Bondi O; Mishan-Shamay H; Shimoni A; Ciceri F; Esteve J; Giebel S; Gorin NC; Schmid C; Polge E; Aljurf M; Kroger N; Craddock C; Bacigalupo A; Cornelissen JJ; Baron F; Unger R; Nagler A; Mohty M
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Oct; 33(28):3144-51. PubMed ID: 26240227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calibrating random forests for probability estimation.
Dankowski T; Ziegler A
Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(22):3949-60. PubMed ID: 27074747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
Shahian DM; O'Brien SM; Filardo G; Ferraris VA; Haan CK; Rich JB; Normand SL; DeLong ER; Shewan CM; Dokholyan RS; Peterson ED; Edwards FH; Anderson RP;
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1 Suppl):S2-22. PubMed ID: 19559822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multinomial logistic regression ensembles.
Lee K; Ahn H; Moon H; Kodell RL; Chen JJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):681-94. PubMed ID: 23611203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk predictions for individual patients from logistic regression were visualized with bar-line charts.
Björk J; Ekelund U; Ohlsson M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22112994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probability machines: consistent probability estimation using nonparametric learning machines.
Malley JD; Kruppa J; Dasgupta A; Malley KG; Ziegler A
Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21915433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
