These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25579637)
1. Performance comparison of 1.5-T endorectal coil MRI with 3.0-T nonendorectal coil MRI in patients with prostate cancer. Shah ZK; Elias SN; Abaza R; Zynger DL; DeRenne LA; Knopp MV; Guo B; Schurr R; Heymsfield SB; Jia G Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 25579637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging]. Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of endorectal coil and nonendorectal coil T2W and diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 Tesla for localizing prostate cancer: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. Turkbey B; Merino MJ; Gallardo EC; Shah V; Aras O; Bernardo M; Mena E; Daar D; Rastinehad AR; Linehan WM; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1443-8. PubMed ID: 24243824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Magnetic resonance tomography with endorectal coil for examination of prostate and seminal vesicles]. Rørvik J Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Feb; 120(6):689-92. PubMed ID: 10806882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hormonal ablation of prostatic cancer: effects on prostate morphology, tumor detection, and staging by endorectal coil MR imaging. Chen M; Hricak H; Kalbhen CL; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Weiss JM; Carroll PR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1157-63. PubMed ID: 8615261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging. Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three Tesla Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison of Performance with and without Endorectal Coil for Prostate Cancer Detection, PI-RADS™ version 2 Category and Staging with Whole Mount Histopathology Correlation. Mirak SA; Shakeri S; Bajgiran AM; Felker ER; Sung KH; Asvadi NH; Khoshnoodi P; Markovic D; Ponzini D; Ahuja P; Sisk A; Reiter RE; Lu D; Raman SS J Urol; 2019 Mar; 201(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30273608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma. Comparison with histologic macrosections in 40 cases]. Torricelli P; Iadanza M; De Santis M; Pollastri CA; Cesinaro AM; Trentini G; Romagnoli R Radiol Med; 1999 Jun; 97(6):491-8. PubMed ID: 10478207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging. Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer. Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Magnetic resonance with an endorectal coil and a fast spin echo sequence in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. The correlation with histopathological data]. Masi A; Olmastroni M; Marin E; Consalvo M; Lascialfari L; Ricupero L; Nicita G; Villari D; Amorosi A; Villari N Radiol Med; 1997 Nov; 94(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 9465216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla. Sosna J; Pedrosa I; Dewolf WC; Mahallati H; Lenkinski RE; Rofsky NM Acad Radiol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):857-62. PubMed ID: 15354305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [MRI staging of prostate cancer with the combined endorectal body phased-array coil and histologic correlation]. Pegios W; Bentas W; Wittmann L; Mack MG; Zangos S; Söllner O; Binder J; Fellbaum C; Jonas D; Vogl TJ Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1660-6. PubMed ID: 14661137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Akin O; Sala E; Moskowitz CS; Kuroiwa K; Ishill NM; Pucar D; Scardino PT; Hricak H Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 16569788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the use of an endorectal coil for 3 T prostate MRI on image quality and cancer detection rate. Gawlitza J; Reiss-Zimmermann M; Thörmer G; Schaudinn A; Linder N; Garnov N; Horn LC; Minh DH; Ganzer R; Stolzenburg JU; Kahn T; Moche M; Busse H Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():40640. PubMed ID: 28145525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Preoperative T-staging of prostatic carcinoma: endorectal magnetic resonance tomography compared with other imaging and clinical methods]. Böni RA; Hutter BE; Trinkler F; Jochum W; Pestalozzi D; Krestin GP Rofo; 1996 Aug; 165(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 8924668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens. Bartolozzi C; Menchi I; Lencioni R; Serni S; Lapini A; Barbanti G; Bozza A; Amorosi A; Manganelli A; Carini M Eur Radiol; 1996; 6(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 8798003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Staging of prostate cancer: results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Tempany CM; Zhou X; Zerhouni EA; Rifkin MD; Quint LE; Piccoli CW; Ellis JH; McNeil BJ Radiology; 1994 Jul; 192(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 8208963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]