These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25580004)

  • 1. Comparison of the sensitivity of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex and operant conditioning in an auditory intensity difference limen paradigm.
    Behrens D; Klump GM
    Hear Res; 2015 Mar; 321():35-44. PubMed ID: 25580004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of mouse minimum audible angle determined in prepulse inhibition and operant conditioning procedures.
    Behrens D; Klump GM
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():167-178. PubMed ID: 26807797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle reflex as a function of the frequency difference between prepulse and background sounds in mice.
    Basavaraj S; Yan J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45123. PubMed ID: 22984620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of acute nicotine on prepulse inhibition of auditory change-related cortical responses.
    Kodaira M; Tsuruhara A; Motomura E; Tanii H; Inui K; Kakigi R
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():27-35. PubMed ID: 23933145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity to a break in interaural correlation is co-modulated by intensity level and interaural delay.
    Kong L; Xie Z; Lu L; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL114-8. PubMed ID: 22894308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory sensitivity of larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) measured using a behavioral prepulse inhibition assay.
    Bhandiwad AA; Zeddies DG; Raible DW; Rubel EW; Sisneros JA
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Sep; 216(Pt 18):3504-13. PubMed ID: 23966590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of prepulse intensity, duration, and bandwidth on perceived intensity of startling acoustic stimuli.
    Swerdlow NR; Blumenthal TD; Sutherland AN; Weber E; Talledo JA
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 17118517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus quality affects expression of the acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition in mice.
    Stoddart CW; Noonan J; Martin-Iverson MT
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 122(3):516-26. PubMed ID: 18513122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: within-channel and across-channel gap detection.
    Lister JJ; Roberts RA; Krause JC; Debiase D; Carlson H
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21303227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of parvalbumin deficiency on the acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition in mice.
    Popelář J; Rybalko N; Burianová J; Schwaller B; Syka J
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Oct; 553():216-20. PubMed ID: 23999028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial hearing ability of the pigmented Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus): Minimum audible angle and spatial release from masking in azimuth.
    Greene NT; Anbuhl KL; Ferber AT; DeGuzman M; Allen PD; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():62-76. PubMed ID: 29778290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory and visual prepulse inhibition in mice: parametric analysis and strain comparisons.
    Aubert L; Reiss D; Ouagazzal AM
    Genes Brain Behav; 2006 Jul; 5(5):423-31. PubMed ID: 16879636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of absolute auditory thresholds in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).
    Osmanski MS; Wang X
    Hear Res; 2011 Jul; 277(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21303689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency discrimination in rats exposed to noise as juveniles.
    Šuta D; Rybalko N; Shen DW; Popelář J; Poon PW; Syka J
    Physiol Behav; 2015 May; 144():60-5. PubMed ID: 25747769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operant methods for mouse psychoacoustics.
    Klink KB; Bendig G; Klump GM
    Behav Res Methods; 2006 Feb; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16817508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The expression of prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex as a function of three pulse stimulus intensities, three prepulse stimulus intensities, and three levels of startle responsiveness in C57BL6/J mice.
    Yee BK; Chang T; Pietropaolo S; Feldon J
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 163(2):265-76. PubMed ID: 16039728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural correlates of perceptual separation-induced enhancement of prepulse inhibition of startle in humans.
    Lei M; Zhang C; Li L
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):472. PubMed ID: 29323167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise exposure during early development influences the acoustic startle reflex in adult rats.
    Rybalko N; Bureš Z; Burianová J; Popelář J; Grécová J; Syka J
    Physiol Behav; 2011 Mar; 102(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 21192960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting Psychoacoustic Methods for the Assessment of Fish Hearing.
    Bhandiwad AA; Sisneros JA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 877():157-84. PubMed ID: 26515314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modification of the acoustic startle response in hearing-impaired C57BL/6J mice: prepulse augmentation and prolongation of prepulse inhibition.
    Willott JF; Carlson S
    Behav Neurosci; 1995 Jun; 109(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 7662150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.