BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25581117)

  • 1. Women aged 75 years and older benefit from mammography.
    Printz C
    Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):165. PubMed ID: 25581117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years with a high or low risk of breast cancer: socioeconomic status, parity, and age at birth of first child.
    Hellquist BN; Czene K; Hjälm A; Nyström L; Jonsson H
    Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 25242087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Higher mammography screening costs without appreciable clinical benefit: the case of digital mammography.
    Kerlikowske K; Hubbard R; Tosteson AN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Aug; 106(8):. PubMed ID: 25031310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How best to determine the mortality benefit from screening mammography: dueling results and methodologies from Canada.
    Harris RP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Nov; 106(11):. PubMed ID: 25274580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. To screen or not to screen women in their 40s for breast cancer: is personalized risk-based screening the answer?
    Mandelblatt JS; Stout N; Trentham-Dietz A
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 21727294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence to Support Screening Women in Their 40s.
    Ray KM; Price ER; Joe BN
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):429-439. PubMed ID: 28411671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Women.
    Ann Intern Med; 2019 Apr; 170(8):. PubMed ID: 30959524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis for breast cancer screening: double reading versus single + CAD reading.
    Sato M; Kawai M; Nishino Y; Shibuya D; Ohuchi N; Ishibashi T
    Breast Cancer; 2014 Sep; 21(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 23104393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer.
    Narod SA; Giannakeas V; Miller AB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 May; 107(5):. PubMed ID: 25855706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
    Eisinger F
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Nov; 102(22):1742; author reply 1742, 1742-3. PubMed ID: 20966429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Wilson C; Decker K; Chiarelli AM; Brisson J; Zhang B; Payne J; Doyle G; Ahmad R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Nov; 106(11):. PubMed ID: 25274578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses.
    Braithwaite D; Walter LC; Izano M; Kerlikowske K
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 May; 31(5):561-72. PubMed ID: 26831305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustaining mammography screening among the medically underserved: a follow-up evaluation.
    Davis TC; Arnold CL; Bennett CL; Wolf MS; Liu D; Rademaker A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2015 Apr; 24(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 25692910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
    Pace LE; He Y; Keating NL
    Cancer; 2013 Jul; 119(14):2518-23. PubMed ID: 23605683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography for women under 50: considerations for fully informed decision making.
    Ernster VL
    Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):257-60; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years.
    Xu W; Vnenchak P; Smucny J
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Mar; 49(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 10735487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death.
    Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):723-8. PubMed ID: 22358016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography screening in Hong Kong Chinese using state-transition Markov modelling.
    Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
    Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Jun; 16 Suppl 3():38-41. PubMed ID: 20601733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of benefit:risk ratio and mortality reduction for the UK Breast Screening Programme.
    Beckett JR; Kotre CJ; Michaelson JS
    Br J Radiol; 2003 May; 76(905):309-20. PubMed ID: 12763946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mammography benefit controversies: sorting the evidence.
    Feig SA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):455-80. PubMed ID: 24792649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.