These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25581288)

  • 1. Standards, accuracy, and questions of bias in Rorschach meta-analyses: reply to Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015).
    Mihura JL; Meyer GJ; Bombel G; Dumitrascu N
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):250-260. PubMed ID: 25581288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) "The scientific status of projective techniques".
    Hibbard S
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 12763700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weighing evidence for the Rorschach's validity: a response to Wood et al. (1999).
    Ganellen RJ
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug; 77(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11562095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analytic methods, the Rorschach, and the MMPI.
    Rosenthal R; Hiller JB; Bornstein RF; Berry DT; Brunell-Neuleib S
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Dec; 13(4):449-51. PubMed ID: 11793890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the science of Rorschach research.
    Meyer GJ
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Aug; 75(1):46-81. PubMed ID: 10941702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A second look at the validity of widely used Rorschach indices: comment on Mihura, Meyer, Dumitrascu, and Bombel (2013).
    Wood JM; Garb HN; Nezworski MT; Lilienfeld SO; Duke MC
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 141(1):236-49. PubMed ID: 25581287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) Psychometric Validity of Individual Variables.
    Tibon Czopp S; Zeligman R
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 27153465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Meta-Analysis of the relationship between the Rorschach Ego Impairment Index (EII) and psychiatric severity.
    Diener MJ; Hilsenroth MJ; Shaffer SA; Sexton JE
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2011; 18(6):464-85. PubMed ID: 20941796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why We Need a Formal Systematic Approach to Validating Psychological Tests: The Case of the Rorschach Comprehensive System.
    Mihura JL; Bombel G; Dumitrascu N; Roy M; Meadows EA
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(4):374-392. PubMed ID: 29723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal stability in the Rorschach method: a meta-analytic review.
    Gronnerod C
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):272-93. PubMed ID: 12763701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Behavioral science foundations of the Rorschach test: research and clinical applications.
    Acklin MW
    Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 10539979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings.
    Garb HN
    Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 10539978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Meta-analyses and P-curves support robust cycle shifts in women's mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014)": Correction to Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014).
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Nov; 143(11):iii. PubMed ID: 29048180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interobserver agreement, intraobserver reliability, and the Rorschach Comprehensive System.
    Acklin MW; McDowell CJ; Verschell MS; Chan D
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Feb; 74(1):15-47. PubMed ID: 10779931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rorschach assessment of changes following psychotherapy: a meta-analytic review.
    Grønnerød C
    J Pers Assess; 2004 Dec; 83(3):256-76. PubMed ID: 15548464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Rorschach and psychopathy: toward a more accurate understanding of the research findings.
    Gacono CB; Loving JL; Bodholdt RH
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug; 77(1):16-38. PubMed ID: 11562100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardizing procedures for calculating rorschach interrater reliability: conceptual and empirical foundations.
    McDowell C; Acklin MW
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Apr; 66(2):308-20. PubMed ID: 8869573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Rorschach Inkblot Test: a case of overstatement?
    Wood JM; Lilienfeld SO
    Assessment; 1999 Dec; 6(4):341-52. PubMed ID: 10539981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The validity of individual Rorschach variables: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system.
    Mihura JL; Meyer GJ; Dumitrascu N; Bombel G
    Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 139(3):548-605. PubMed ID: 22925137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.