BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25581342)

  • 1. Outlier robust nonlinear mixed model estimation.
    Williams JD; Birch JB; Abdel-Salam AS
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1304-16. PubMed ID: 25581342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the nonparametric estimation method in NONMEM VI.
    Savic RM; Kjellsson MC; Karlsson MO
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Apr; 37(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19159684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust parameter estimation of intensity distributions for brain magnetic resonance images.
    Schroeter P; Vesin JM; Langenberger T; Meuli R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Apr; 17(2):172-86. PubMed ID: 9688150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fisher information matrix for nonlinear mixed effects multiple response models: evaluation of the appropriateness of the first order linearization using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.
    Bazzoli C; Retout S; Mentré F
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1940-56. PubMed ID: 19266541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative assessment of parameter estimation methods in the presence of overdispersion: a simulation study.
    Roosa K; Luo R; Chowell G
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 May; 16(5):4299-4313. PubMed ID: 31499663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The bayesian bias correction method of the first-order approximation of nonlinear mixed-effects models for population pharmacokinetics.
    Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):381-92. PubMed ID: 17479388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of assay measurement error on parameter estimation in concentration-QTc interval modeling.
    Bonate PL
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 23606626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measures of performance in nonlinear estimation tasks: prediction of estimation performance at low signal-to-noise ratio.
    Müller SP; Abbey CK; Rybicki FJ; Moore SC; Kijewski MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3697-715. PubMed ID: 16077222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
    Wagler A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals for intraclass correlation coefficients in a nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis.
    Demetrashvili N; Van den Heuvel ER
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):548-55. PubMed ID: 25703393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction discrepancies for the evaluation of nonlinear mixed-effects models.
    Mentré F; Escolano S
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2006 Jun; 33(3):345-67. PubMed ID: 16284919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation Methods for Mixed Logistic Models with Few Clusters.
    McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(6):790-804. PubMed ID: 27802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Profile likelihood-based confidence intervals using Monte Carlo integration for population pharmacokinetic parameters.
    Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I; Yafune A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 16584067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous estimation of parameters in the bivariate Emax model.
    Magnusdottir BT; Nyquist H
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3714-23. PubMed ID: 26190048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing for parallelism in the heteroscedastic four-parameter logistic model.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 25629201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transform-both-sides nonlinear models for in vitro pharmacokinetic experiments.
    Latif AH; Gilmour SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Jun; 24(3):306-24. PubMed ID: 25038072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods.
    Lele SR; Dennis B; Lutscher F
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Jul; 10(7):551-63. PubMed ID: 17542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Novel Method for Qualification of a Potency Assay through Partial Computer Simulation.
    Novick S; Sondag P; Schofield T; Miller K
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):249-263. PubMed ID: 29444993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining the error of dose estimates and minimum and maximum acceptable concentrations from assays with nonlinear dose-response curves.
    Gottschalk PG; Dunn JR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 16256244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.