These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25581979)

  • 1. Spatter contamination in dental practices--how can it be prevented?
    Graetz C; Bielfeldt J; Tillner A; Plaumann A; Dörfer CE
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2014; 118(4):1122-34. PubMed ID: 25581979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness of two dry-field isolation techniques.
    Dahlke WO; Cottam MR; Herring MC; Leavitt JM; Ditmyer MM; Walker RS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Nov; 143(11):1199-204. PubMed ID: 23115148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The usefulness of the modified extra-oral vacuum aspirator (EOVA) from household vacuum cleaner in reducing bacteria in dental aerosols.
    Teanpaisan R; Taeporamaysamai M; Rattanachone P; Poldoung N; Srisintorn S
    Int Dent J; 2001 Dec; 51(6):413-6. PubMed ID: 11789707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of aerosols produced by ultrasonic scalers.
    Harrel SK; Barnes JB; Rivera-Hidalgo F
    J Periodontol; 1996 Jan; 67(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8676269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blood contamination of the aerosols produced by in vivo use of ultrasonic scalers.
    Barnes JB; Harrel SK; Rivera-Hidalgo F
    J Periodontol; 1998 Apr; 69(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 9609373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinsing and high volume evacuator attachment alone and in combination in reducing the amount of viable aerosols produced during ultrasonic scaling procedure.
    Devker NR; Mohitey J; Vibhute A; Chouhan VS; Chavan P; Malagi S; Joseph R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):681-9. PubMed ID: 23250175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of suction device with saliva ejector for aerosol and spatter reduction during ultrasonic scaling.
    Holloman JL; Mauriello SM; Pimenta L; Arnold RR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Jan; 146(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 25569495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A laboratory comparison of evacuation devices on aerosol reduction.
    Jacks ME
    J Dent Hyg; 2002; 76(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 12271865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications.
    Harrel SK; Molinari J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Apr; 135(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 15127864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A pilot study of bioaerosol reduction using an air cleaning system during dental procedures.
    Hallier C; Williams DW; Potts AJ; Lewis MA
    Br Dent J; 2010 Oct; 209(8):E14. PubMed ID: 20953167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness evaluation of different suction systems.
    Junevicius J; Surna A; Surna R
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(2):52-7. PubMed ID: 16254467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atmospheric contamination during ultrasonic scaling.
    Timmerman MF; Menso L; Steinfort J; van Winkelhoff AJ; van der Weijden GA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Jun; 31(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 15142216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental microbial contamination. Pilot study in a dental surgery.
    Osorio R; Toledano M; Liébana J; Rosales JI; Lozano JA
    Int Dent J; 1995 Dec; 45(6):352-7. PubMed ID: 8666461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures.
    Bentley CD; Burkhart NW; Crawford JJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 May; 125(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 8195499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aerial dispersal of blood-contaminated aerosols during dental procedures.
    Yamada H; Ishihama K; Yasuda K; Hasumi-Nakayama Y; Shimoji S; Furusawa K
    Quintessence Int; 2011 May; 42(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 21519559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aerosol and splatter production by focused spray and standard ultrasonic inserts.
    Rivera-Hidalgo F; Barnes JB; Harrel SK
    J Periodontol; 1999 May; 70(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 10368050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of spatter generation and contamination during instrument cleaning prior to sterilization.
    Eisen S; Eisen D; Farmelant J
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2006; 55(2):26-9. PubMed ID: 16937905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy versus health risks: An in vitro evaluation of power-driven scalers.
    Graetz C; Plaumann A; Bielfeldt J; Tillner A; Sälzer S; Dörfer CE
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2015; 19(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 25810588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduction of bacteria-containing spray produced during ultrasonic scaling.
    Klyn SL; Cummings DE; Richardson BW; Davis RD
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(6):648-52. PubMed ID: 12024755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bacterial aerosols in the dental clinic: a review.
    Leggat PA; Kedjarune U
    Int Dent J; 2001 Feb; 51(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 11326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.