133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25582530)
1. A Pilot Study on the Development of Remote Quality Control of Digital Mammography Systems in the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
Looney P; Halling-Brown MD; Oduko JM; Young KC
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 25582530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Physical and technical quality assurance in German breast cancer screening: progress report of the Reference Center Muenster after three years].
Sommer A; Girnus R; Wendt B; Czwoydzinski J; Wüstenbecker C; Heindel W; Lenzen H
Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 19391067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; Bacher K; De Hauwere A; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 17696080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):539-48. PubMed ID: 18374533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multiparametric automatic method to monitor long-term reproducibility in digital mammography: results from a regional screening programme.
Gennaro G; Ballaminut A; Contento G
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3776-3787. PubMed ID: 28130611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality control for digital tomosynthesis in the ECOG-ACRIN EA1151 TMIST trial.
Maki AK; Mawdsley GE; Mainprize JG; Pisano ED; Shen SZ; Alonzo-Proulx O; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7441-7461. PubMed ID: 37830895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography in the Norwegian breast-screening programme.
Pedersen K; Nordanger J
Eur Radiol; 2002 Feb; 12(2):463-70. PubMed ID: 11870451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance results from a breast screening pilot study.
Thiele DL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):163-8. PubMed ID: 1953503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program].
Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic positioning quality of newly trained versus experienced radiographers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.
van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; den Heeten GJ; Timmers J; Broeders MJ
Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3322-7. PubMed ID: 25987428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.
Parikh J; Fanus D
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):854-60. PubMed ID: 17411717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artifacts in digital mammography.
Van Ongeval C; Jacobs J; Bosmans H
JBR-BTR; 2008; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience with the European quality assurance guidelines for digital mammography systems in a national screening programme.
McCullagh J; Keavey E; Egan G; Phelan N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 23173219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of mammography equipment in the Macedonian breast screening campaign 2008/2009.
Gershan V; Antevska-Grujoska S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):187-91. PubMed ID: 21733866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The current status of full-field digital mammography quality control.
Williams MB; Goodale PJ; Butler PF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):936-51. PubMed ID: 17411736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and experience of quality control methods for digital breast tomosynthesis systems.
Strudley CJ; Young KC; Looney P; Gilbert FJ
Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150324. PubMed ID: 26462598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
