These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25582754)

  • 1. Look back for the Charlson Index did not improve risk adjustment of cancer surgical outcomes.
    Dobbins TA; Creighton N; Currow DC; Young JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 25582754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing measures of comorbidity and functional status for risk adjustment to compare hospital performance for colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective data-linkage study.
    Dobbins TA; Badgery-Parker T; Currow DC; Young JM
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015 Jul; 15():55. PubMed ID: 26174550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.
    Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16488357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of variation in colorectal cancer care and outcomes in New South Wales: a population-based health data linkage study.
    Jorgensen ML; Young JM; Dobbins TA; Solomon MJ
    Med J Aust; 2014 Apr; 200(7):403-7. PubMed ID: 24794673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multipurpose comorbidity scoring system performed better than the Charlson index.
    Holman CD; Preen DB; Baynham NJ; Finn JC; Semmens JB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):1006-14. PubMed ID: 16168346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a self-report-generated Charlson Comorbidity Index for predicting mortality.
    Chaudhry S; Jin L; Meltzer D
    Med Care; 2005 Jun; 43(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 15908856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and testing of a systemic lupus-specific risk adjustment index for in-hospital mortality.
    Ward MM
    J Rheumatol; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1408-13. PubMed ID: 10852262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ICD-10 Charlson Comorbidity Index predicted mortality but not resource utilization following hip fracture.
    Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 25447352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of Comorbidity with Anastomotic Leak, 30-day Mortality, and Length of Stay in Elective Surgery for Colonic Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Krarup PM; Nordholm-Carstensen A; Jorgensen LN; Harling H
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):668-76. PubMed ID: 26200681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Charlson Comorbidity Index can add prognostic information to Rapid Emergency Medicine Score as a predictor of long-term mortality.
    Olsson T; Terent A; Lind L
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 12(5):220-4. PubMed ID: 16175058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Best Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index With Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality.
    Bannay A; Chaignot C; Blotière PO; Basson M; Weill A; Ricordeau P; Alla F
    Med Care; 2016 Feb; 54(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 26683778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New ICD-10 version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System outperformed Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in an older population.
    Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():62-69. PubMed ID: 27101889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uptake and outcomes of laparoscopically assisted resection for colon and rectal cancer in Australia: a population-based study.
    Dobbins TA; Young JM; Solomon MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Apr; 57(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 24608296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
    Iversen LH
    Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative charlson comorbidity score predicts postoperative outcomes among older intracranial meningioma patients.
    Grossman R; Mukherjee D; Chang DC; Bennett R; Brem H; Olivi A; Quiñones-Hinojosa A
    World Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 75(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 21492731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Co-morbidity provide significant improvement on age adjustment when predicting medical outcomes?
    Mnatzaganian G; Ryan P; Hiller JE
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 24514895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of hospital morbidity data and the performance of comorbidity scores as predictors of mortality.
    Mnatzaganian G; Ryan P; Norman PE; Hiller JE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 21803545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
    Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of postoperative short-term and long-term mortality risk in Chinese geriatric patients for hip fracture using the Charlson comorbidity score.
    Lau TW; Fang C; Leung F
    Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Feb; 22(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 26680155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practices.
    Bottle A; Aylin P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1426-33. PubMed ID: 21764557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.