BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25582914)

  • 1. Evaluations of dentists on a German physician rating Website: an analysis of the ratings.
    Emmert M; Halling F; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e15. PubMed ID: 25582914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrument.
    Emmert M; Meier F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e157. PubMed ID: 23919987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One Decade of Online Patient Feedback: Longitudinal Analysis of Data From a German Physician Rating Website.
    Emmert M; McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e24229. PubMed ID: 34309579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Reimann S
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e299. PubMed ID: 28842391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study.
    Emmert M; Meier F; Pisch F; Sander U
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Aug; 15(8):e187. PubMed ID: 23985220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Influence of Paid Memberships on Physician Rating Websites With the Example of the German Portal Jameda: Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.
    Armbruster FAD; Brüggmann D; Groneberg DA; Bendels M
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e39259. PubMed ID: 37014690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study.
    Liu JJ; Matelski JJ; Bell CM
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e76. PubMed ID: 29514775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do Physicians Respond to Web-Based Patient Ratings? An Analysis of Physicians' Responses to More Than One Million Web-Based Ratings Over a Six-Year Period.
    Emmert M; Sauter L; Jablonski L; Sander U; Taheri-Zadeh F
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jul; 19(7):e275. PubMed ID: 28747292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis.
    Rothenfluh F; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jun; 20(6):e212. PubMed ID: 29903704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.