These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25584325)

  • 41. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Role of TiF4 in Microleakage of Silorane and Methacrylate-based Composite Resins in Class V Cavities.
    Koohpeima F; Sharafeddin F; Jowkar Z; Ahmadzadeh S; Mokhtari MJ; Azarian B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Mar; 17(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 27207205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical evaluation of the failure rate of metallic brackets bonded with orthodontic composites.
    Romano FL; Valério RA; Gomes-Silva JM; Ferreira JT; Faria G; Borsatto MC
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 23207856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication.
    Baysal A; Uysal T; Gul N; Alan MB; Ramoglu SI
    Korean J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 42(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 23112930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of the conventional, soft start, and pulse delay modes produced by light-emitting diode device on microleakage beneath metal brackets: An in vitro comparative study.
    Najjar YM; Burhan AS; Hajeer MY; Nawaya FR
    Int Orthod; 2023 Mar; 21(1):100718. PubMed ID: 36516656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bond Strength and Deflection of Four Types of Bonded Lingual Retainers.
    Golshah A; Feyli SA
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():1707520. PubMed ID: 35251180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Micro-CT evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic ceramic brackets bonded with different bonding techniques and adhesives.
    Öztürk F; Ersöz M; Öztürk SA; Hatunoğlu E; Malkoç S
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25855655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Creep Behavior of Resin Composite Interface Between Orthodontic Brackets and Enamel.
    Durgesh BH; Alkheraif AA; Musaibah AS; Asiry MA; Varrela J; Vallittu PK
    J Adhes Dent; 2018; 20(5):417-424. PubMed ID: 30349906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer-a study of the initial bond strength.
    Radlanski RJ; Zain ND
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Jul; 65(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 15289924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of bond strength of molar orthodontic tubes subjected to reinforcement with flowable and bonding resins.
    Veiga Jardim AF; Azevedo MN; Souza JB; Freitas JC; Estrela C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Sep; 81(5):350-359. PubMed ID: 32500218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In vitro evaluation of microleakage under ceramic and metal brackets bonded with LED and plasma arc curing.
    Davari A; Yassaei S; Karandish M; Zarghami F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):644-9. PubMed ID: 23250168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microleakage beneath orthodontic brackets in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) AT 1.5 & 3 Tesla.
    Bolat Gümüş E; Şatir S; Kuştarci A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 May; 51(4):20210512. PubMed ID: 35113678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Direct Bonding System with and without a Liquid Primer: An
    Devatha AB; Lakshmi MN; Kumar NB; Erukala S; Valluri R; Ealla KKR
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2019 Nov; 11(Suppl 3):S515-S522. PubMed ID: 31920268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fear of the Relapse: Effect of Composite Type on Adhesion Efficacy of Upper and Lower Orthodontic Fixed Retainers: In Vitro Investigation and Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Scribante A; Gallo S; Turcato B; Trovati F; Gandini P; Sfondrini MF
    Polymers (Basel); 2020 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 32326201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with nano-filled composites.
    Chalipa J; Akhondi MS; Arab S; Kharrazifard MJ; Ahmadyar M
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 24910655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Shear bond strength of orthodontic resins after caries infiltrant preconditioning.
    Naidu E; Stawarczyk B; Tawakoli PN; Attin R; Attin T; Wiegand A
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 22908947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention.
    Rose E; Frucht S; Jonas IE
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Sep; 33(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 12238688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Sfondrini MF; Cacciafesta V; Pistorio A; Sfondrini G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11174537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Torque resistance of different stainless steel wires commonly used for fixed retainers in orthodontics.
    Arnold DT; Dalstra M; Verna C
    J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 43(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 27104351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Failure Rates of Orthodontic Fixed Lingual Retainers bonded with Two Flowable Light-cured Adhesives: A Comparative Prospective Clinical Trial.
    Talic NF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):630-4. PubMed ID: 27659078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.