162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25585203)
61. Measuring and assessing individual external doses during the rehabilitation phase in Iitate village after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
Naito W; Uesaka M; Kurosawa T; Kuroda Y
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):606-622. PubMed ID: 28510538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Radiation fields and dose assessments in Korean nuclear power plants.
Kim HG; Kong TY; Jeong WT; Kim ST
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):136-9. PubMed ID: 21498858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. A brief overview of the registration system of radiation exposure doses for decontamination workers and their occupational health management.
Fukunaga H; Asano T
J Occup Health; 2022 Jan; 64(1):e12357. PubMed ID: 36377572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Intake of radioactive materials as assessed by the duplicate diet method in Fukushima.
Sato O; Nonaka S; Tada JI
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):823-38. PubMed ID: 24080864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Perception of Radiation Risk by Japanese Radiation Specialists Evaluated as a Safe Dose Before the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
Miura M; Ono K; Yamauchi M; Matsuda N
Health Phys; 2016 Jun; 110(6):558-62. PubMed ID: 27115222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Radiation doses among residents living 37 km northwest of the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant.
Kamada N; Saito O; Endo S; Kimura A; Shizuma K
J Environ Radioact; 2012 Aug; 110():84-9. PubMed ID: 22445876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. What have we learned from a questionnaire survey of citizens and doctors both inside and outside Fukushima?: survey comparison between 2011 and 2013.
Kohzaki M; Ootsuyama A; Moritake T; Abe T; Kubo T; Okazaki R
J Radiol Prot; 2015 Mar; 35(1):N1-17. PubMed ID: 25580668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Re: Associations Between Childhood Thyroid Cancer and External Radiation Dose After the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident.
Tsuda T; Tokinobu A; Yamamoto E; Suzuki E
Epidemiology; 2018 Nov; 29(6):e56-e57. PubMed ID: 30052543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. A comprehensive dose evaluation project concerning animals affected by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident: its set-up and progress.
Takahashi S; Inoue K; Suzuki M; Urushihara Y; Kuwahara Y; Hayashi G; Shiga S; Fukumoto M; Kino Y; Sekine T; Abe Y; Fukuda T; Isogai E; Yamashiro H; Fukumoto M
J Radiat Res; 2015 Dec; 56 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i36-41. PubMed ID: 26687285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. [Questionnaire Survey of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Workers in 2016 on Knowledge and Anxiety About Radiation].
Hayashi T; Mafune K; Matsuda N; Hasegawa A; Kato T; Kanda R; Shimada Y; Satoh K; Mori K; Tateishi S; Kohzaki M; Okazaki R
J UOEH; 2020; 42(4):339-346. PubMed ID: 33268612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Radiocesium derived from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in seabed sediments: initial deposition and inventories.
Otosaka S; Kato Y
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 May; 16(5):978-90. PubMed ID: 24743987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture--a preliminary review of current plans.
Akiba S
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22327057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Radiation and Regulation in a Post-Fukushima World.
Macfarlane A
Health Phys; 2016 Feb; 110(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 26717163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Radioxenon monitoring in Beijing following the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident.
Shilian W; Qi L; Qinghua M; Zhanying C; Yungang Z; Huijuan L; Huaimao J; Yinzhong C; Shujiang L; Xinjun Z; Yuanqing F; Ling W; Yun L
Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Nov; 81():344-7. PubMed ID: 23601858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. A review of the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident: radiation effects on the thyroid and strategies for prevention.
Nagataki S; Takamura N
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2014 Oct; 21(5):384-93. PubMed ID: 25122492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Estimating Annual Individual Doses for Evacuees Returning Home to Areas Affected by the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
Yajima K; Kurihara O; Ohmachi Y; Takada M; Omori Y; Akahane K; Kim E; Torikoshi M; Yonehara H; Yoshida S; Sakai K; Akashi M
Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 26107433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Iodine-129 in seawater offshore Fukushima: distribution, inorganic speciation, sources, and budget.
Hou X; Povinec PP; Zhang L; Shi K; Biddulph D; Chang CC; Fan Y; Golser R; Hou Y; Ješkovský M; Jull AJ; Liu Q; Luo M; Steier P; Zhou W
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(7):3091-8. PubMed ID: 23461388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Using and Explaining Individual Dosimetry Data.
Miyazaki M
Asia Pac J Public Health; 2017 Mar; 29(2_suppl):110S-119S. PubMed ID: 28330408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Radioactivity from Fukushima nuclear accident detected in Lisbon, Portugal.
Carvalho FP; Reis MC; Oliveira JM; Malta M; Silva L
J Environ Radioact; 2012 Dec; 114():152-6. PubMed ID: 22503401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Estimation of immediate fallout after the accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant by using HPGe detector and EGS5 code.
Unno Y; Yunoki A; Sato Y; Hino Y
Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Nov; 81():348-52. PubMed ID: 23570955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
