These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25585409)

  • 21. Ablation of typical atrial flutter: a prospective study of cooled-tip versus 8-mm-tip catheters.
    Iori M; Bottoni N; Quartieri F; Sassone B; Guerzoni S
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2014 Jun; 62(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 24831764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of the accuracy of contact force measurement by contemporary force-sensing ablation catheters.
    Kueffer T; Haeberlin A; Knecht S; Baldinger SH; Madaffari A; Seiler J; Mühl A; Tanner H; Roten L; Reichlin T
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Feb; 34(2):292-299. PubMed ID: 36490307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Target indices for clinical ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from contact force, electrogram, and biophysical parameter analysis.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Feb; 7(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 24443504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors affecting catheter contact in the human left atrium and their impact on ablation efficacy.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 25213917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measurement of electrical coupling between cardiac ablation catheters and tissue.
    Deno DC; Sih HJ; Miller SP; Teplitsky LR; Kuenzi R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Mar; 61(3):765-74. PubMed ID: 24235298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Safety profiles and lesion size of different radiofrequency ablation technologies: a comparison of large tip, open and closed irrigation catheters.
    Everett TH; Lee KW; Wilson EE; Guerra JM; Varosy PD; Olgin JE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 18803562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of ventricular radiofrequency lesions in sheep using standard irrigated tip catheter versus catheter ablation enabling direct visualization.
    Sacher F; Derval N; Jadidi A; Scherr D; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Dos Santos P; Jais P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Aug; 23(8):869-73. PubMed ID: 22554117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intracardiac MR imaging (ICMRI) guiding-sheath with amplified expandable-tip imaging and MR-tracking for navigation and arrythmia ablation monitoring: Swine testing at 1.5 and 3T.
    Schmidt EJ; Olson G; Tokuda J; Alipour A; Watkins RD; Meyer EM; Elahi H; Stevenson WG; Schweitzer J; Dumoulin CL; Johnson T; Kolandaivelu A; Loew W; Halperin HR
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Jun; 87(6):2885-2900. PubMed ID: 35142398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Soft Miniaturized Actuation and Sensing Units for Dynamic Force Control of Cardiac Ablation Catheters.
    Kumar N; Wirekoh J; Saba S; Riviere CN; Park YL
    Soft Robot; 2021 Feb; 8(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 32392453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Endocardial versus epicardial ventricular radiofrequency ablation: utility of in vivo contact force assessment.
    Sacher F; Wright M; Derval N; Denis A; Ramoul K; Roten L; Pascale P; Bordachar P; Ritter P; Hocini M; Dos Santos P; Haissaguerre M; Jais P
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Feb; 6(1):144-50. PubMed ID: 23392586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of an integrated optical contact force monitoring sensor for cardiac ablation catheters.
    Jang Ah Kim ; Changmin Kim ; Kihong Park ; Kulkarni A; Taesung Kim
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():4363-6. PubMed ID: 26737261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ablation effect indicated by impedance fall is correlated with contact force level during ablation for atrial fibrillation.
    De Bortoli A; Sun LZ; Solheim E; Hoff PI; Schuster P; Ohm OJ; Chen J
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1210-5. PubMed ID: 23865557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. "Largest amplitude ablation" is the optimal approach for typical atrial flutter ablation: a subanalysis from the AURUM 8 study.
    Lewalter T; Lickfett L; Weiss C; Mewis C; Spencker S; Jung W; Haverkamp W; Schwacke H; Deneke T; Proff J; Dorwarth U; Bauer W
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 23(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 22458432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Real-time assessment of catheter contact and orientation using an integrated optical coherence tomography cardiac ablation catheter.
    Yu X; Singh-Moon RP; Hendon CP
    Appl Opt; 2019 May; 58(14):3823-3829. PubMed ID: 31158201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prospective randomised comparison of irrigated-tip and large-tip catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.
    Scavée C; Jaïs P; Hsu LF; Sanders P; Hocini M; Weerasooriya R; Macle L; Raybaud F; Clementy J; Haïssaguerre M
    Eur Heart J; 2004 Jun; 25(11):963-9. PubMed ID: 15172468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Convective cooling effect on cooled-tip catheter compared to large-tip catheter radiofrequency ablation.
    Pilcher TA; Sanford AL; Saul JP; Haemmerich D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Dec; 29(12):1368-74. PubMed ID: 17201844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enhanced efficiency of a novel porous tip irrigated RF ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.
    Park CI; Lehrmann H; Keyl C; Weber R; Schurr P; Schiebeling-Römer J; Allgeier J; Herrera CS; Kienzle RP; Shah D; Neumann FJ; Arentz T; Jadidi AS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Dec; 24(12):1328-35. PubMed ID: 23889915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feasibility of real-time MRI with a novel carbon catheter for interventional electrophysiology.
    Nordbeck P; Bauer WR; Fidler F; Warmuth M; Hiller KH; Nahrendorf M; Maxfield M; Wurtz S; Geistert W; Broscheit J; Jakob PM; Ritter O
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Jun; 2(3):258-67. PubMed ID: 19808476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter design on lesion formation and complications: in vitro comparison of 6 different devices.
    Guerra JM; Jorge E; Raga S; Gálvez-Montón C; Alonso-Martín C; Rodríguez-Font E; Cinca J; Viñolas X
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1157-62. PubMed ID: 23718822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of Type 1 atrial flutter using a large-tip electrode catheter and high-power radiofrequency energy generator.
    Feld GK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2004 Nov; 1(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 16293039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.