These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25585549)

  • 1. The dynamic changes of anti-Mullerian hormone and inhibin B during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in decreased ovarian reserve women and the effect on clinical outcome.
    Li Y; Nie M; Liu Y; Zhang W; Yang X
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2015 Jun; 31(6):450-3. PubMed ID: 25585549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Follicular fluid anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B concentrations: comparison between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and GnRH antagonist cycles.
    Lee JR; Kim SH; Kim SM; Jee BC; Ku SY; Suh CS; Choi YM; Kim JG; Moon SY
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):860-7. PubMed ID: 18249372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels to predict oocyte maturity and embryo quality during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
    Melado Vidales L; Fernández-Nistal A; Martínez Fernández V; Verdú Merino V; Bruna Catalán I; Bajo Arenas JM
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):225-232. PubMed ID: 27352270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anti-Müllerian hormone dynamics during GNRH-antagonist short protocol for IVF/ICSI in women with varying ovarian reserve levels.
    Melado Vidales L; Fernández-Nistal A; Martínez Fernández V; Verdú Merino V; Bruna Catalán I; Bajo Arenas JM
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Apr; 69(2):128-134. PubMed ID: 27310675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic antimüllerian hormone levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation predict in vitro fertilization response and pregnancy outcomes.
    Styer AK; Gaskins AJ; Brady PC; Sluss PM; Chavarro JE; Hauser RB; Toth TL
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1153-61.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26315051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Value of serum inhibin B measurement in predicting ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization cycle].
    Chen Y; Yu Q; Zhang YW; He FF; Sun ZY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 41(6):368-71. PubMed ID: 16831355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes and correlations of anti-Müllerian hormone and stem-cell factors in different ovarian reserve patients during GnRH-antagonist protocol and the effects on controlled ovarian hyperstimulation outcomes.
    Liu XH; Wu XH; Yang S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Dec; 300(6):1773-1783. PubMed ID: 31631249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical value of serum anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B in prediction of ovarian response in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
    Zhang F; Liu XL; Rong N; Huang XW
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 37(1):70-73. PubMed ID: 28224431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B as predictors of pregnancy after treatment by in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Wunder DM; Guibourdenche J; Birkhäuser MH; Bersinger NA
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2203-10. PubMed ID: 18291376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamics of serum anti-Mullerian-hormone levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH-antagonist short protocol in polycystic ovary syndrome and low responders.
    Weintraub A; Margalioth EJ; Chetrit AB; Gal M; Goldberg D; Alerhand S; Eldar-Geva T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 May; 176():163-7. PubMed ID: 24630573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Correlation between serum inhibin B level after treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].
    Lin WQ; Yang HY; Lin JJ; Chen X; Ye BL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 44(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 19570462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
    Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which cut-off value of serum anti-Müllerian hormone level can predict poor ovarian reserve, poor ovarian response to stimulation and in vitro fertilization success? A prospective data analysis.
    Ficicioglu C; Cenksoy PO; Yildirim G; Kaspar C
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 May; 30(5):372-6. PubMed ID: 24576292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anti-Mullerian hormone is a better marker than inhibin B, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol or antral follicle count in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
    Kunt C; Ozaksit G; Keskin Kurt R; Cakir Gungor AN; Kanat-Pektas M; Kilic S; Dede A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21562964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation.
    Jayaprakasan K; Campbell B; Hopkisson J; Johnson I; Raine-Fenning N
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 19046583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B concentrations are not useful predictors of ovarian response during ovulation induction treatment with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
    Lie Fong S; Schipper I; de Jong FH; Themmen AP; Visser JA; Laven JS
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Aug; 96(2):459-63. PubMed ID: 21719005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome.
    Eldar-Geva T; Ben-Chetrit A; Spitz IM; Rabinowitz R; Markowitz E; Mimoni T; Gal M; Zylber-Haran E; Margalioth EJ
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Nov; 20(11):3178-83. PubMed ID: 16113044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gonadotrophin stimulation for in vitro fertilization significantly alters the hormone milieu in follicular fluid: a comparative study between natural cycle IVF and conventional IVF.
    von Wolff M; Kollmann Z; Flück CE; Stute P; Marti U; Weiss B; Bersinger NA
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 24608520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of anti-Müllerian hormone as a test for the prediction of ovarian reserve.
    Kwee J; Schats R; McDonnell J; Themmen A; de Jong F; Lambalk C
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 17923131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anti-Mullerian hormone dynamics during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and optimal timing of measurement for outcome prediction.
    Lee JR; Kim SH; Kim SM; Jee BC; Ku SY; Suh CS; Choi YM; Kim JG; Moon SY
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Oct; 25(10):2597-604. PubMed ID: 20729237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.