These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25585923)
1. Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations. Knief U; Hemmrich-Stanisak G; Wittig M; Franke A; Griffith SC; Kempenaers B; Forstmeier W Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Apr; 114(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 25585923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation. Forstmeier W; Schielzeth H; Mueller JC; Ellegren H; Kempenaers B Mol Ecol; 2012 Jul; 21(13):3237-49. PubMed ID: 22554318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs. Santure AW; Stapley J; Ball AD; Birkhead TR; Burke T; Slate J Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1439-51. PubMed ID: 20149098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A high-quality pedigree and genetic markers both reveal inbreeding depression for quality but not survival in a cooperative mammal. Wells DA; Cant MA; Nichols HJ; Hoffman JI Mol Ecol; 2018 May; 27(9):2271-2288. PubMed ID: 29603504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient? Wang J Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association mapping of morphological traits in wild and captive zebra finches: reliable within, but not between populations. Knief U; Schielzeth H; Backström N; Hemmrich-Stanisak G; Wittig M; Franke A; Griffith SC; Ellegren H; Kempenaers B; Forstmeier W Mol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 26(5):1285-1305. PubMed ID: 28100011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inbreeding causes early death in a passerine bird. Hemmings NL; Slate J; Birkhead TR Nat Commun; 2012 May; 3():863. PubMed ID: 22643890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic Variation of Inbreeding and Ancestry in the Remaining Two Isle Royale Wolves. Hedrick PW; Kardos M; Peterson RO; Vucetich JA J Hered; 2017 Mar; 108(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 27940471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic variation and differentiation in captive and wild zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Forstmeier W; Segelbacher G; Mueller JC; Kempenaers B Mol Ecol; 2007 Oct; 16(19):4039-50. PubMed ID: 17894758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How many SNPs are enough? Smouse PE Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1265-6. PubMed ID: 20456228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identification of genomic regions associated with inbreeding depression in Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle. Pryce JE; Haile-Mariam M; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Nov; 46(1):71. PubMed ID: 25407532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds. Zhang Q; Calus MP; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sahana G BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meiotic recombination shapes precision of pedigree- and marker-based estimates of inbreeding. Knief U; Kempenaers B; Forstmeier W Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Mar; 118(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 27804967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees. Kardos M; Luikart G; Allendorf FW Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Jul; 115(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 26059970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suitability of Pedigree Information and Genomic Methods for Analyzing Inbreeding of Polish Cold-Blooded Horses Covered by Conservation Programs. Polak G; Gurgul A; Jasielczuk I; Szmatoła T; Krupiński J; Bugno-Poniewierska M Genes (Basel); 2021 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 33802830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us? Ruiz-López MJ; Roldán ER; Espeso G; Gomendio M Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1352-64. PubMed ID: 19368643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of pedigree- and DNA-based measures for identifying inbreeding depression in the critically endangered Attwater's Prairie-chicken. Hammerly SC; Morrow ME; Johnson JA Mol Ecol; 2013 Nov; 22(21):5313-28. PubMed ID: 24118220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Autozygosity islands and ROH patterns in Nellore lineages: evidence of selection for functionally important traits. Peripolli E; Metzger J; de Lemos MVA; Stafuzza NB; Kluska S; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Berton MP; Lopes FB; Munari DP; Lôbo RB; Magnabosco CU; Di Croce F; Osterstock J; Denise S; Pereira ASC; Baldi F BMC Genomics; 2018 Sep; 19(1):680. PubMed ID: 30223795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of runs of homozygosity and their relationship with inbreeding in five cattle breeds farmed in Italy. Marras G; Gaspa G; Sorbolini S; Dimauro C; Ajmone-Marsan P; Valentini A; Williams JL; Macciotta NP Anim Genet; 2015 Apr; 46(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 25530322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic consequences of intensive inbreeding in an isolated wolf population. Kardos M; Åkesson M; Fountain T; Flagstad Ø; Liberg O; Olason P; Sand H; Wabakken P; Wikenros C; Ellegren H Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Jan; 2(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 29158554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]