358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25586711)
1. The effectiveness of health animations in audiences with different health literacy levels: an experimental study.
Meppelink CS; van Weert JC; Haven CJ; Smit EG
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):e11. PubMed ID: 25586711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should We Be Afraid of Simple Messages? The Effects of Text Difficulty and Illustrations in People With Low or High Health Literacy.
Meppelink CS; Smit EG; Buurman BM; van Weert JC
Health Commun; 2015; 30(12):1181-9. PubMed ID: 26372031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of modality and narration style on recall of online health information: results from a Web-based experiment.
Bol N; van Weert JC; de Haes HC; Loos EF; Smets EM
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e104. PubMed ID: 25910416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accessibility of standardized information of a national colorectal cancer screening program for low health literate screening invitees: A mixed method study.
Fransen MP; Dekker E; Timmermans DRM; Uiters E; Essink-Bot ML
Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Feb; 100(2):327-336. PubMed ID: 27613567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.
Housten AJ; Kamath GR; Bevers TB; Cantor SB; Dixon N; Hite A; Kallen MA; Leal VB; Li L; Volk RJ
Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 31795820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory: a randomized controlled trial.
Freed E; Long D; Rodriguez T; Franks P; Kravitz RL; Jerant A
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Aug; 92(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 23541216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels.
Woudstra AJ; Smets EMA; Dekker E; Broens THF; Penning J; Smith S; McCaffery K; Fransen MP
Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Oct; 102(10):1847-1858. PubMed ID: 31064682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What did the doctor say? Health literacy and recall of medical instructions.
McCarthy DM; Waite KR; Curtis LM; Engel KG; Baker DW; Wolf MS
Med Care; 2012 Apr; 50(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 22411440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [3-dimensional computer animation--a new medium for supporting patient education before surgery. Acceptance and assessment of patients based on a prospective randomized study--picture versus text].
Hermann M
Chirurg; 2002 May; 73(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 12089836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Illustrations enhance older colorectal cancer patients' website satisfaction and recall of online cancer information.
Bol N; Smets EM; Eddes EH; de Haes JC; Loos EF; van Weert JC
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2015 Mar; 24(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 25615269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects on Engagement and Health Literacy Outcomes of Web-Based Materials Promoting Physical Activity in People With Diabetes: An International Randomized Trial.
Muller I; Rowsell A; Stuart B; Hayter V; Little P; Ganahl K; Müller G; Doyle G; Chang P; Lyles CR; Nutbeam D; Yardley L
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):e21. PubMed ID: 28115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health literacy and cancer prevention: two new instruments to assess comprehension.
Mazor KM; Roblin DW; Williams AE; Greene SM; Gaglio B; Field TS; Costanza ME; Han PK; Saccoccio L; Calvi J; Cove E; Cowan R
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jul; 88(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 22244323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can donated media placements reach intended audiences?
Cooper CP; Gelb CA; Chu J; Polonec L
Health Promot Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 23720533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using pictographs to enhance recall of spoken medical instructions II.
Houts PS; Witmer JT; Egeth HE; Loscalzo MJ; Zabora JR
Patient Educ Couns; 2001 Jun; 43(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 11384821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients' preferences for visuals: differences in the preferred level of detail, type of background and type of frame of icons depicting organs between literate and low-literate people.
van Beusekom M; Bos M; Wolterbeek R; Guchelaar HJ; van den Broek J
Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Feb; 98(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 25468391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Are German information materials on colorectal cancer screening understandable or do they fail? Rating of health information by users with different educational backgrounds].
Seidel G; Münch I; Dreier M; Borutta B; Walter U; Dierks ML
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2014 Mar; 57(3):366-79. PubMed ID: 24562713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.
Gaissmaier W; Wegwarth O; Skopec D; Müller AS; Broschinski S; Politi MC
Health Psychol; 2012 May; 31(3):286-96. PubMed ID: 21842998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Literacy, cognitive ability, and the retention of health-related information about colorectal cancer screening.
Wilson EA; Wolf MS; Curtis LM; Clayman ML; Cameron KA; Eigen KV; Makoul G
J Health Commun; 2010; 15 Suppl 2():116-25. PubMed ID: 20845198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Information needs and preferences of low and high literacy consumers for decisions about colorectal cancer screening: utilizing a linguistic model.
Smith SK; Trevena L; Nutbeam D; Barratt A; McCaffery KJ
Health Expect; 2008 Jun; 11(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 18494957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
