These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25587669)

  • 1. Delayed Stream Segregation in Older Adults: More Than Just Informational Masking.
    Ezzatian P; Li L; Pichora-Fuller K; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):482-4. PubMed ID: 25587669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
    Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of priming on release from informational masking is equivalent for younger and older adults.
    Ezzatian P; Li L; Pichora-Fuller K; Schneider B
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 21178568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.
    Sommers MS; Gehr SE
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 264(1-2):56-62. PubMed ID: 20006694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type.
    Buss E; Hodge SE; Calandruccio L; Leibold LJ; Grose JH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 30601213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of voice cuing on releasing speech from informational masking disappears in older adults.
    Huang Y; Xu L; Wu X; Li L
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 20531200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adding irrelevant information to the content prime reduces the prime-induced unmasking effect on speech recognition.
    Wu M; Li H; Gao Y; Lei M; Teng X; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):136-43. PubMed ID: 22101022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Contribution of Individual Differences in Memory Span and Language Ability to Spatial Release From Masking in Young Children.
    MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Füllgrabe C; Eccles R; van der Linde J; Panebianco C; Fels J; Ljung R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 31619115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding.
    Rosen S; Souza P; Ekelund C; Majeed AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2431-43. PubMed ID: 23556608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of masker type, sentence context, and listener age on speech recognition performance in 1-back listening tasks.
    Schurman J; Brungart D; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3337. PubMed ID: 25480078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition for school-age children and adults tested in multi-tone vs multi-noise-band maskers.
    Buss E; Leibold LJ; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1458. PubMed ID: 29604693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.