These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25588387)

  • 1. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 25588387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.
    Hair K; Bahor Z; Macleod M; Liao J; Sena ES
    BMC Biol; 2023 Sep; 21(1):189. PubMed ID: 37674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research.
    Borissov N; Haas Q; Minder B; Kopp-Heim D; von Gernler M; Janka H; Teodoro D; Amini P
    Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 11(1):172. PubMed ID: 35978441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automation of duplicate record detection for systematic reviews: Deduplicator.
    Forbes C; Greenwood H; Carter M; Clark J
    Syst Rev; 2024 Aug; 13(1):206. PubMed ID: 39095913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rule-based deduplication of article records from bibliographic databases.
    Jiang Y; Lin C; Meng W; Yu C; Cohen AM; Smalheiser NR
    Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014():bat086. PubMed ID: 24434031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deduplicating records in systematic reviews: there are free, accurate automated ways to do so.
    Guimarães NS; Ferreira AJF; Ribeiro Silva RC; de Paula AA; Lisboa CS; Magno L; Ichiara MY; Barreto ML
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 152():110-115. PubMed ID: 36241035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
    Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval comparison of EndNote to search MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed) versus searching them directly.
    Gall C; Brahmi FA
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2004; 23(3):25-32. PubMed ID: 15364649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews.
    Rathbone J; Albarqouni L; Bakhit M; Beller E; Byambasuren O; Hoffmann T; Scott AM; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references.
    McKeown S; Mir ZM
    Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):38. PubMed ID: 33485394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.
    Rathbone J; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():80. PubMed ID: 26073974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study filters for non-randomized studies of interventions consistently lacked sensitivity upon external validation.
    Hausner E; Metzendorf MI; Richter B; Lotz F; Waffenschmidt S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 30563471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference checking for systematic reviews using Endnote.
    Bramer WM
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2018 Oct; 106(4):542-546. PubMed ID: 30271303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
    Wright K; Golder S; Rodriguez-Lopez R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():73. PubMed ID: 24893958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Reference manager EndNote 4. Further development and new functions].
    Reiss M; Reiss G; Pausch NC
    Radiologe; 2001 Jun; 41(6):511-4. PubMed ID: 11458786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supplementary strategies identified additional eligible studies in qualitative systematic reviews.
    Frandsen TF; Eriksen MB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():85-91. PubMed ID: 37201687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Title and Abstract Screening and Evaluation in Systematic Reviews (TASER): a pilot randomised controlled trial of title and abstract screening by medical students.
    Ng L; Pitt V; Huckvale K; Clavisi O; Turner T; Gruen R; Elliott JH
    Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 3():121. PubMed ID: 25335439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
    Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):200. PubMed ID: 30458825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.