BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25588711)

  • 21. [Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Indications, technique, advantages and disadvantages].
    Richter M; Weidenfeld M; Uckmann FP
    Orthopade; 2015 Feb; 44(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 25501711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Fan G; Wu X; Yu S; Sun Q; Guan X; Zhang H; Gu X; He S
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9540298. PubMed ID: 27747244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Systematic Review of Lumbar Fusion Rates With and Without the Use of rhBMP-2.
    Galimberti F; Lubelski D; Healy AT; Wang T; Abdullah KG; Nowacki AS; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(14):1132-9. PubMed ID: 25955186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reoperation within 2 years after lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study.
    Kobayashi K; Ando K; Kato F; Kanemura T; Sato K; Hachiya Y; Matsubara Y; Kamiya M; Sakai Y; Yagi H; Shinjo R; Nishida Y; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Aug; 27(8):1972-1980. PubMed ID: 29423887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Single-level Posterolateral Fusion (PLF) Alone and Posterior Interbody Fusion (PLIF/TLIF) Alone Lead to a Decreased Risk of Short-term Complications Compared to Combined PLF With PLIF/TLIF Procedures: A Matched Analysis.
    Plantz MA; Hsu WK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(21):E1391-E1399. PubMed ID: 32796465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
    Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference?
    Cheng JS; Park P; Le H; Reisner L; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E6. PubMed ID: 23905957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.
    Lee JC; Jang HD; Shin BJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1548-57. PubMed ID: 22426447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
    Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
    Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety.
    Selznick LA; Shamji MF; Isaacs RE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 May; 22(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 19412024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.
    Epstein NE
    Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 3):S83-95. PubMed ID: 26904372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
    Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Lumbar fusion-Indications and techniques].
    Schnake KJ; Rappert D; Storzer B; Schreyer S; Hilber F; Mehren C
    Orthopade; 2019 Jan; 48(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 30552449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of (Partial) economic evaluations of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in adults with lumbar spondylolisthesis: A systematic review.
    Caelers IJMH; de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; Evers SMAA; van Santbrink H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245963. PubMed ID: 33571291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis.
    Xu H; Tang H; Guan X; Jiang F; Xu N; Ju W; Zhu X; Zhang X; Zhang Q; Li M
    Neurosurgery; 2013 Mar; 72(1 Suppl Operative):21-6. PubMed ID: 23037820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Complications associated with the use of the recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins for posterior interbody fusions of the lumbar spine.
    Chrastil J; Low JB; Whang PG; Patel AA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(16):E1020-7. PubMed ID: 23629484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.