These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Advances in quantitative proteomics via stable isotope tagging and mass spectrometry. Tao WA; Aebersold R Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2003 Feb; 14(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 12566010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Automation of On-Resin Enrichment of S-Nitrosylated Proteins for Oxidized Cysteine-Selective cPILOT. Pumford AD; Arul AB; Ford KI; Robinson RAS Vanderbilt Undergrad Res J; 2021 Apr; 11():43-51. PubMed ID: 35615079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Systematic evaluation of label-free and super-SILAC quantification for proteome expression analysis. Tebbe A; Klammer M; Sighart S; Schaab C; Daub H Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2015 May; 29(9):795-801. PubMed ID: 26377007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Selective Maleylation-Directed Isobaric Peptide Termini Labeling for Accurate Proteome Quantification. Tian X; de Vries MP; Visscher SWJ; Permentier HP; Bischoff R Anal Chem; 2020 Jun; 92(11):7836-7844. PubMed ID: 32319746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Quantitative proteomics using 16O/18O labeling and linear ion trap mass spectrometry. López-Ferrer D; Ramos-Fernández A; Martínez-Bartolomé S; García-Ruiz P; Vázquez J Proteomics; 2006 Apr; 6 Suppl 1():S4-11. PubMed ID: 16534745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Dimethyl multiplexed labeling combined with microcolumn separation and MS analysis for time course study in proteomics. Hsu JL; Huang SY; Chen SH Electrophoresis; 2006 Sep; 27(18):3652-60. PubMed ID: 16927424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Inverse 15N-metabolic labeling/mass spectrometry for comparative proteomics and rapid identification of protein markers/targets. Wang YK; Ma Z; Quinn DF; Fu EW Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2002; 16(14):1389-97. PubMed ID: 12112619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The use of a quantitative cysteinyl-peptide enrichment technology for high-throughput quantitative proteomics. Liu T; Qian WJ; Camp DG; Smith RD Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 359():107-24. PubMed ID: 17484113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Systematic comparison of label-free, metabolic labeling, and isobaric chemical labeling for quantitative proteomics on LTQ Orbitrap Velos. Li Z; Adams RM; Chourey K; Hurst GB; Hettich RL; Pan C J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1582-90. PubMed ID: 22188275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Quantitative serum proteomics using dual stable isotope coding and nano LC-MS/MSMS. Wang H; Wong CH; Chin A; Kennedy J; Zhang Q; Hanash S J Proteome Res; 2009 Dec; 8(12):5412-22. PubMed ID: 19817497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Large-Scale and Deep Quantitative Proteome Profiling Using Isobaric Labeling Coupled with Two-Dimensional LC-MS/MS. Gritsenko MA; Xu Z; Liu T; Smith RD Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1410():237-47. PubMed ID: 26867748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Isobaric tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics: the ups and downs. Christoforou AL; Lilley KS Anal Bioanal Chem; 2012 Sep; 404(4):1029-37. PubMed ID: 22580419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Identification of thioredoxin target protein networks in cardiac tissues of a transgenic mouse. Fu C; Liu T; Parrott AM; Li H Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1005():181-97. PubMed ID: 23606258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. An improved measurement of isotopic ratios by high resolution mass spectrometry. Ilchenko S; Previs SF; Rachdaoui N; Willard B; McCullough AJ; Kasumov T J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2013 Feb; 24(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 23283729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Cysteine-reactive covalent capture tags for enrichment of cysteine-containing peptides. Giron P; Dayon L; Mihala N; Sanchez JC; Rose K Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2009 Nov; 23(21):3377-86. PubMed ID: 19813279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]