84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25588936)
1. Early Success Is Vital in Minimal Worksite Wellness Interventions at Small Worksites.
Ablah E; Dong F; Konda K; Konda K; Armbruster S; Tuttle B
Health Educ Behav; 2015 Aug; 42(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 25588936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small Steps Are Easier Together: a goal-based ecological intervention to increase walking by women in rural worksites.
Warren BS; Maley M; Sugarwala LJ; Wells MT; Devine CM
Prev Med; 2010; 50(5-6):230-4. PubMed ID: 20188751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Steps that count! The development of a pedometer-based health promotion intervention in an employed, health insured South African population.
Pillay JD; Kolbe-Alexander TL; Proper KI; van Mechelen W; Lambert EV
BMC Public Health; 2012 Oct; 12():880. PubMed ID: 23075000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does a corporate worksite physical activity program reach those who are inactive? Findings from an evaluation of the Global Corporate Challenge.
Macniven R; Engelen L; Kacen MJ; Bauman A
Health Promot J Austr; 2015 Aug; 26(2):142-145. PubMed ID: 25917174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Worksite Opportunities for Wellness (WOW): effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors after 1 year.
Racette SB; Deusinger SS; Inman CL; Burlis TL; Highstein GR; Buskirk TD; Steger-May K; Peterson LR
Prev Med; 2009; 49(2-3):108-14. PubMed ID: 19576927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program.
Tilley BC; Vernon SW; Myers R; Glanz K; Lu M; Hirst K; Kristal AR
Prev Med; 1999 Mar; 28(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 10072746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An exploratory study of inclusive worksite wellness: Considering employees with disabilities.
Cook LH; Foley JT; Semeah LM
Disabil Health J; 2016 Jan; 9(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 26471518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Employee advisory boards as a vehicle for organizing worksite health promotion programs.
Sorensen G; Hsieh J; Hunt MK; Morris DH; Harris DR; Fitzgerald G
Am J Health Promot; 1992; 6(6):443-50, 464. PubMed ID: 10148721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health benefits of a pedometer-based physical activity intervention in sedentary workers.
Chan CB; Ryan DA; Tudor-Locke C
Prev Med; 2004 Dec; 39(6):1215-22. PubMed ID: 15539058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intervention fidelity and effectiveness of a UK worksite physical activity intervention funded by the BUPA Foundation, UK.
Lawton R; Mceachan R; Jackson C; West R; Conner M
Health Promot Int; 2015 Mar; 30(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 25296727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions in Small, Low-Wage Worksites: A Randomized Controlled Trial in King County, Washington (2014-2017).
Hannon PA; Hammerback K; Kohn MJ; Kava CM; Gary Chan KC; Parrish AT; Allen C; Helfrich CD; Mayotte C; Beresford SA; Harris JR
Am J Public Health; 2019 Dec; 109(12):1739-1746. PubMed ID: 31622155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of worksite and employee variables on employee engagement in telephonic health coaching programs: a retrospective multivariate analysis.
Grossmeier J
Am J Health Promot; 2013; 27(3):e69-80. PubMed ID: 23286600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Effectiveness of Two Walking Interventions on Participation, Step Counts, and Health.
Smith-McLallen A; Heller D; Vernisi K; Gulick D; Cruz S; Snyder RL
Am J Health Promot; 2017 Mar; 31(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 28423931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Challenges of a worksite health promotion project.
Gates DM; Brehm BJ
AAOHN J; 2010 Mar; 58(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 20210262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seattle 5 a Day worksite program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption.
Beresford SA; Thompson B; Feng Z; Christianson A; McLerran D; Patrick DL
Prev Med; 2001 Mar; 32(3):230-8. PubMed ID: 11277680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical Activity for Campus Employees: A University Worksite Wellness Program.
Butler CE; Clark BR; Burlis TL; Castillo JC; Racette SB
J Phys Act Health; 2015 Apr; 12(4):470-6. PubMed ID: 24905703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Process evaluation of an environmental walking and healthy eating pilot in small rural worksites.
Devine CM; Maley M; Farrell TJ; Warren B; Sadigov S; Carroll J
Eval Program Plann; 2012 Feb; 35(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 22054528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Incentivized, Workplace Physical Activity Intervention Preferentially Increases Daily Steps in Inactive Employees.
Mason MR; Ickes MJ; Campbell MS; Bollinger LM
Am J Health Promot; 2018 Mar; 32(3):638-645. PubMed ID: 28851235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of an employer-sponsored pedometer-based physical activity program.
Behrens TK; Domina L; Fletcher GM
Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):968-76. PubMed ID: 18229551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of a multi-strategy workplace physical activity intervention promoting pedometer use and step count increase.
De Cocker KA; De Bourdeaudhuij IM; Cardon GM
Health Educ Res; 2010 Aug; 25(4):608-19. PubMed ID: 19751999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
