These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25589911)

  • 41. Exploring barriers to the sustainability of an electronic administration system in long-term care facilities: A case study approach.
    Karsan Y; Anderson C; Boyd MJ; Thornley T
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2021 Jun; 17(6):1066-1071. PubMed ID: 32878714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessing implementation fidelity of an on-site pharmacist intervention within Australian residential aged care facilities: A mixed methods study.
    Batten M; Koerner J; Kosari S; Naunton M; Lewis J; Strickland K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Oct; 23(1):1166. PubMed ID: 37891564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dose Verification Errors in Hospitals: Literature Review of the eMAR-based Systems Used by Nurses.
    Hunt S; Chakraborty J
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2021 Apr-Jun 01; 36(2):182-187. PubMed ID: 32541426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of a BCMA's Electronic Medication Administration Record.
    Staggers N; Iribarren S; Guo JW; Weir C
    West J Nurs Res; 2015 Jul; 37(7):899-921. PubMed ID: 25601936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of Medication Incidents in a Long-term Care Facility Using Electronic Medication Administration Records and Barcode Technology.
    Fuller AEC; Guirguis LM; Sadowski CA; Makowsky MJ
    Sr Care Pharm; 2022 Sep; 37(9):421-447. PubMed ID: 36039004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessment of eHealth capabilities and utilization in residential care settings.
    Towne SD; Lee S; Li Y; Smith ML
    Health Informatics J; 2016 Dec; 22(4):1063-1075. PubMed ID: 26512032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effectiveness of an electronic inpatient medication record in reducing medication errors in Singapore.
    Choo J; Johnston L; Manias E
    Nurs Health Sci; 2014 Jun; 16(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 23855683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Medication incident reporting in residential aged care facilities: limitations and risks to residents' safety.
    Tariq A; Georgiou A; Westbrook J
    BMC Geriatr; 2012 Nov; 12():67. PubMed ID: 23122411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Use of information technology for medication management in residential care facilities: correlates of facility characteristics.
    Bhuyan SS; Chandak A; Powell MP; Kim J; Shiyanbola O; Zhu H; Shiyanbola O
    J Med Syst; 2015 Jun; 39(6):70. PubMed ID: 25967399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
    Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Usability inspection to improve an electronic provincial medication repository.
    Kitson NA; Price M; Bowen M; Lau F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 183():168-73. PubMed ID: 23388276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PAEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (PICU) MEDICATION RECONCILIATION (MR) FORM.
    Murray D; Sedgeworth C; Kinnear M; Diack L
    Arch Dis Child; 2016 Sep; 101(9):e2. PubMed ID: 27540258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use in Long-Term Care Facilities: An Antimicrobial Mapping Survey.
    Maher D; Sluggett JK; Soriano J; Hull DA; Hillock NT
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2024 Sep; 25(9):105144. PubMed ID: 38991651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Healthcare IT usability and suitability for clinical needs: challenges of design, workflow, and contractual relations.
    Koppel R; Kreda DA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 157():7-14. PubMed ID: 20543360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing.
    Abramson EL; Patel V; Malhotra S; Pfoh ER; Nena Osorio S; Cheriff A; Cole CL; Bunce A; Ash J; Kaushal R
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Aug; 81(8):539-48. PubMed ID: 22465355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Learning to work with electronic patient records and prescription charts: experiences and perceptions of hospital pharmacists.
    Burgin A; O'Rourke R; Tully MP
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2014; 10(5):741-55. PubMed ID: 24378236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Potential safety gaps in order entry and automated drug alerts: a nationwide survey of VA physician self-reported practices with computerized order entry.
    Spina JR; Glassman PA; Simon B; Lanto A; Lee M; Cunningham F; Good CB
    Med Care; 2011 Oct; 49(10):904-10. PubMed ID: 21666510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Electronic transfer of prescription-related information: comparing views of patients, general practitioners, and pharmacists.
    Porteous T; Bond C; Robertson R; Hannaford P; Reiter E
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Mar; 53(488):204-9. PubMed ID: 14694696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mapping the route to medication therapy management documentation and billing standardization and interoperabilility within the health care system: meeting proceedings.
    Millonig MK
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2009; 49(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 19357067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Systematic Review of Quantitative Methods for Evaluating Electronic Medication Administration Record and Bar-Coded Medication Administration Usability.
    Pruitt ZM; Kazi S; Weir C; Taft T; Busog DN; Ratwani R; Hettinger AZ
    Appl Clin Inform; 2023 Jan; 14(1):185-198. PubMed ID: 36889339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.