These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25590185)
21. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing. Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies. Sakamoto T; Matsuda T; Nakajima T; Saito Y Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e295-300. PubMed ID: 23527478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates. Sherer EA; Imler TD; Imperiale TF Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):545-53. PubMed ID: 22138085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate. Patel NC; Islam RS; Wu Q; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Crowell MD; Faigel DO Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 23199647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adenomas per colonoscopy and adenoma per positive participant as quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. Wang S; Kim AS; Church TR; Perdue DG; Shaukat A Endosc Int Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):E1560-E1565. PubMed ID: 33140011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy. Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting. Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program. Brenner H; Altenhofen L; Kretschmann J; Rösch T; Pox C; Stock C; Hoffmeister M Gastroenterology; 2015 Aug; 149(2):356-66.e1. PubMed ID: 25911510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation. Hsieh YH; Tseng CW; Hu CT; Koo M; Leung FW Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jul; 86(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 27988288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]