These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25590185)

  • 21. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
    Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinicopathological features of colorectal polyps: evaluation of the 'predict, resect and discard' strategies.
    Sakamoto T; Matsuda T; Nakajima T; Saito Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e295-300. PubMed ID: 23527478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.
    Sherer EA; Imler TD; Imperiale TF
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):545-53. PubMed ID: 22138085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.
    Patel NC; Islam RS; Wu Q; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Crowell MD; Faigel DO
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 23199647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
    Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3).
    Adler A; Wegscheider K; Lieberman D; Aminalai A; Aschenbeck J; Drossel R; Mayr M; Mroß M; Scheel M; Schröder A; Gerber K; Stange G; Roll S; Gauger U; Wiedenmann B; Altenhofen L; Rosch T
    Gut; 2013 Feb; 62(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 22442161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Adenomas per colonoscopy and adenoma per positive participant as quality indicators for screening colonoscopy.
    Wang S; Kim AS; Church TR; Perdue DG; Shaukat A
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):E1560-E1565. PubMed ID: 33140011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Endoscopist Fatigue May Contribute to a Decline in the Effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy.
    Lee CK; Cha JM; Kim WJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 49(6):e51-6. PubMed ID: 25110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training.
    van Doorn SC; Klanderman RB; Hazewinkel Y; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Jul; 82(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 25817896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A survey of patient acceptance of resect and discard for diminutive polyps.
    Rex DK; Patel NJ; Vemulapalli KC
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):376-380.e1. PubMed ID: 26071067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice.
    le Clercq CM; Mooi RJ; Winkens B; Salden BN; Bakker CM; van Nunen AB; Keulen EP; de Ridder RJ; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 26808394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Linked color imaging, mucosal exposure device, their combination, and standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.
    Aniwan S; Vanduangden K; Kerr SJ; Piyachaturawat P; Jangsirikul S; Luangsukrerk T; Kulpatcharapong S; Tiankanon K; Kongtab N; Wisedopas N; Kullavanijaya P; Rerknimitr R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 Nov; 94(5):969-977. PubMed ID: 34081966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.
    Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Risk factors associated with colorectal flat adenoma detection.
    Nicolás-Pérez D; Parra-Blanco A; Gimeno-García AZ; Ortega-Sánchez JA; Carrillo-Palau M; Jiménez-Sosa A; Quintero-Carrion E
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Mar; 25(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 23169312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Polypectomy rate: a surrogate for adenoma detection rate varies by colon segment, gender, and endoscopist.
    Gohel TD; Burke CA; Lankaala P; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Sanaka MR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 12(7):1137-42. PubMed ID: 24315881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trends in Adenoma Detection Rates During the First 10 Years of the German Screening Colonoscopy Program.
    Brenner H; Altenhofen L; Kretschmann J; Rösch T; Pox C; Stock C; Hoffmeister M
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Aug; 149(2):356-66.e1. PubMed ID: 25911510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation.
    Hsieh YH; Tseng CW; Hu CT; Koo M; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jul; 86(1):192-201. PubMed ID: 27988288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.