165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25591841)
1. Para-aortic nodal metastases in cervical cancer: a blind spot in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system: current diagnosis and management.
Hwang L; Bailey A; Lea J; Albuquerque K
Future Oncol; 2015; 11(2):309-22. PubMed ID: 25591841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
Fastrez M; Goffin F; Vergote I; Vandromme J; Petit P; Leunen K; Degueldre M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Aug; 92(8):895-901. PubMed ID: 23590725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction model for para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Shim SH; Kim DY; Lee SJ; Kim SN; Kang SB; Lee SW; Park JY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 144(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 27855989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pretreatment retroperitoneal para-aortic lymph node staging in advanced cervical cancer: a review.
Smits RM; Zusterzeel PL; Bekkers RL
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):973-83. PubMed ID: 24978708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upstaging by para-aortic lymph node dissection in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Thelissen AAB; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; van der Leij F; Peters M; Gerestein CG; Zweemer RP; van Rossum PSN
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):667-674. PubMed ID: 34969533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Significance of para-aortic lymph node evaluation in patients with FIGO IIIC1 cervical cancer.
Cho WK; Kim YJ; Kim H; Kim YS; Park W
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2020 Sep; 50(10):1150-1156. PubMed ID: 32577748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early-stage cervical adenocarcinoma treated by surgical intent: the role of para-aortic lymph node dissection.
Lea JS; Sheets EE; Duska LR; Miller DS; Schorge JO
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Feb; 84(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 11812088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Para-aortic lymph node involvement in cervical cancer: Implications for staging, outcome and treatment.
Shylasree TS; Gurram L; Das U
Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):267-272. PubMed ID: 35295007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Lee JY; Kim Y; Lee TJ; Jeon YW; Kim K; Chung HH; Kim HJ; Park SM; Kim JW
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 26(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 25925292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of patients after extraperitoneal lymph node dissection for cervical cancer.
Denschlag D; Gabriel B; Mueller-Lantzsch C; Tempfer C; Henne K; Gitsch G; Hasenburg A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 15721408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET.
Gouy S; Morice P; Narducci F; Uzan C; Gilmore J; Kolesnikov-Gauthier H; Querleu D; Haie-Meder C; Leblanc E
Lancet Oncol; 2012 May; 13(5):e212-20. PubMed ID: 22554549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual pelvic lymph node involvement after concomitant chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Houvenaeghel G; Lelievre L; Rigouard AL; Buttarelli M; Jacquemier J; Viens P; Gonzague-Casabianca L
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 16406062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?
Marnitz S; Köhler C; Roth C; Füller J; Hinkelbein W; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 16126259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Risk factors and prognosis of node-positive cervical carcinoma].
Feng SY; Zhang YN; Liu JG
Ai Zheng; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1261-6. PubMed ID: 16219145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Upper margin of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.
Ouldamer L; Fichet-Djavadian S; Marret H; Barillot I; Body G
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):893-900. PubMed ID: 22553934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additional value of combined evaluation of tumor size with lymph node size in the detection of lymph node metastases in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
Kang S; Kim YS; Choi HJ; Kim MH; Cho KS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 23863534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Management of Para-aortic Lymph Node Disease in Patients With Cervical Cancer: What Is the Best Approach?
Negrão MV; Lima JM; Silva SC; Diz MD; da Costa Miranda V
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Mar; 27(3):543-549. PubMed ID: 28107261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas.
Querleu D; Dargent D; Ansquer Y; Leblanc E; Narducci F
Cancer; 2000 Apr; 88(8):1883-91. PubMed ID: 10760766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]