These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25592498)

  • 1. The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less useful.
    Werner R
    Nature; 2015 Jan; 517(7534):245. PubMed ID: 25592498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Row erupts over university's use of research metrics in job-cut decisions.
    Else H
    Nature; 2021 Apr; 592(7852):19. PubMed ID: 33767466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time to remodel the journal impact factor.
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):466. PubMed ID: 27466089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
    Catlow R
    Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The staff dreams are made of.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7039):242-3. PubMed ID: 15889106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Let's move beyond the rhetoric: it's time to change how we judge research.
    Curry S
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7691):147. PubMed ID: 29420505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.
    Hicks D; Wouters P; Waltman L; de Rijcke S; Rafols I
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):429-31. PubMed ID: 25903611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research assessment: the limits of excellence.
    McGilvray A
    Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7510):S64-6. PubMed ID: 25054853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fewer numbers, better science.
    Benedictus R; Miedema F; Ferguson MW
    Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7626):453-455. PubMed ID: 27786219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perspective: powering up citations.
    Finkel A
    Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7510):S77. PubMed ID: 25054856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responsible research assessment faces the acid test.
    Nature; 2021 Jul; 595(7868):471-472. PubMed ID: 34290433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perspective: Give youth a chance.
    Wang CC
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S36. PubMed ID: 25924199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
    Ploegh H
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The maze of impact metrics.
    Nature; 2013 Oct; 502(7471):271. PubMed ID: 24137834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact factors: Cash puts publishing ethics at risk in China.
    Huggett S
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7420):342. PubMed ID: 23075972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publish or perish in China.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact-factor rewards affect Spanish research.
    Jiménez-Contreras E; Delgado López-Cózar E; Ruiz-Pérez R; Fernández VM
    Nature; 2002 Jun; 417(6892):898. PubMed ID: 12087380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do impact factors relate to the real world?
    Skórka P
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remember why we work on cancer.
    Garraway L
    Nature; 2017 Mar; 543(7647):613-615. PubMed ID: 28358103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Confusing the confused: thoughts on impact factor, h(irsch) index, Q value, and other cofactors that influence the researcher's happiness].
    Quindós G
    Rev Iberoam Micol; 2009 Jun; 26(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19631157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.