127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25592866)
1. Relationship between physical factors and subjective image quality of cone-beam computed tomography images according to diagnostic task.
Choi JW; Lee SS; Choi SC; Heo MS; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Kang SR; Han DH; Kim EK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2015 Mar; 119(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 25592866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of exposure parameters and relationship between subjective and technical image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Park HN; Min CK; Kim KA; Koh KJ
Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Jun; 49(2):139-151. PubMed ID: 31281791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Gröndahl K
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 20965675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cone-beam CT dose and imaging performance evaluation with a modular, multipurpose phantom.
Siewerdsen JH; Uneri A; Hernandez AM; Burkett GW; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):467-479. PubMed ID: 31808950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction.
Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dedicated mobile volumetric cone-beam computed tomography for human brain imaging: A phantom study.
Ryu JH; Kim TH; Jeong CW; Jun HY; Heo DW; Lee J; Kim KW; Yoon KH
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 26410658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a low-dose protocol for cone beam CT examinations of the anterior maxilla in children.
Hidalgo Rivas JA; Horner K; Thiruvenkatachari B; Davies J; Theodorakou C
Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150559. PubMed ID: 26279087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W
Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between CNR and visibility of anatomical structures of cone-beam computed tomography images under different exposure parameters.
Wang MF; Xie X; Li G; Zhang Z
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Jul; 49(5):20190336. PubMed ID: 32045279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality assessment of clinically-applied CBCT protocols using a QAT phantom.
Elkhateeb SM; Torgersen GR; Arnout EA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(5):20160075. PubMed ID: 27078054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations.
Al-Okshi A; Theodorakou C; Lindh C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Mar; 46(3):20160311. PubMed ID: 27910717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-year analysis of Elekta CBCT image quality using NPS and MTF.
Nakahara S; Tachibana M; Watanabe Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):211-222. PubMed ID: 27167279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward standardized quantitative image quality (IQ) assessment in computed tomography (CT): A comprehensive framework for automated and comparative IQ analysis based on ICRU Report 87.
Pahn G; Skornitzke S; Schlemmer HP; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 26520485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance characteristics of a novel megavoltage cone-beam-computed tomography device.
Fast MF; Koenig T; Oelfke U; Nill S
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):N15-24. PubMed ID: 22251668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region.
Elstrøm UV; Muren LP; Petersen JB; Grau C
Acta Oncol; 2011 Aug; 50(6):908-17. PubMed ID: 21767191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effects of positioning and configuration on contrast-to-noise ratio in the quality control of a 3D Accuitomo 170 dental CBCT system.
Taylor C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(5):20150430. PubMed ID: 27008106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of subjective image quality, contrast to noise ratio and modulation transfer function in the middle ear using a novel full body cone beam computed tomography device.
Heikkinen AK; Rissanen V; Aarnisalo AA; Nyman K; Sinkkonen ST; Koivisto J
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 37038130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective image quality assurance in cone-beam CT: Test methods, analysis, and workflow in longitudinal studies.
Johnston A; Mahesh M; Uneri A; Rypinski TA; Boone JM; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2424-2443. PubMed ID: 38354310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
