These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25592866)

  • 41. Comparison of 6 cone-beam computed tomography systems for image quality and detection of simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Nackaerts O; ; Willems G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e129-39. PubMed ID: 21889061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Acquisition of MV-scatter-free kilovoltage CBCT images during RapidArc™ or VMAT.
    Ling C; Zhang P; Etmektzoglou T; Star-Lack J; Sun M; Shapiro E; Hunt M
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Jul; 100(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 21821301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
    Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy and validity of stitching sectional cone beam computed tomographic images.
    Kim MK; Kang SH; Lee EH; Lee SH; Park W
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1071-6. PubMed ID: 22777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Contrast-to-noise ratio difference in small field of view cone beam computed tomography machines.
    Bechara B; McMahan CA; Moore WS; Noujeim M; Geha H; Teixeira FB
    J Oral Sci; 2012 Sep; 54(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 23047033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A phantom for simplified image quality control of dental cone beam computed tomography units.
    Torgersen GR; Hol C; Møystad A; Hellén-Halme K; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Nov; 118(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 25442498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners.
    Loubele M; Jacobs R; Maes F; Denis K; White S; Coudyzer W; Lambrichts I; van Steenberghe D; Suetens P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):309-18. PubMed ID: 18757715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dose reduction for kilovotage cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy.
    Wang J; Li T; Liang Z; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(11):2897-909. PubMed ID: 18460749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography contrast validation of an artificial periodontal phantom for use in endodontics.
    Michetti J; Basarab A; Tran M; Diemer F; Kouame D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():7905-8. PubMed ID: 26738125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cone-beam computed tomography: a new method for imaging of the temporal bone.
    Peltonen LI; Aarnisalo AA; Käser Y; Kortesniemi MK; Robinson S; Suomalainen A; Jero J
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 19353342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. GPU-based iterative cone-beam CT reconstruction using tight frame regularization.
    Jia X; Dong B; Lou Y; Jiang SB
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(13):3787-807. PubMed ID: 21628778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cone beam computed tomography image guidance system for a dedicated intracranial radiosurgery treatment unit.
    Ruschin M; Komljenovic PT; Ansell S; Ménard C; Bootsma G; Cho YB; Chung C; Jaffray D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jan; 85(1):243-50. PubMed ID: 22560556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography.
    Araki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):862-5. PubMed ID: 22092375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Phantom and in-vivo measurements of dose exposure by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT): MV portal images vs. kV portal images vs. cone-beam CT.
    Walter C; Boda-Heggemann J; Wertz H; Loeb I; Rahn A; Lohr F; Wenz F
    Radiother Oncol; 2007 Dec; 85(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 18023491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The accuracy of image guided surgery based on cone beam computer tomography image data.
    Eggers G; Senoo H; Kane G; Mühling J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):e41-8. PubMed ID: 19157914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Estimation of contrast-to-noise ratio in CT and CBCT images with varying scan settings in presence of different implant materials.
    Kursun-Cakmak EŞ; Demirturk Kocasarac H; Bayrak S; Ustaoğlu G; Noujeim M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(8):20190139. PubMed ID: 31386553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Factors affecting modulation transfer function measurements in cone-beam computed tomographic images.
    Choi JW
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Jun; 49(2):131-137. PubMed ID: 31281790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. WE-G-217BCD-04: Diagnostic Image Quality Evaluation of a Dedicated Extremity Cone- Beam CT Scanner: Pre-Clinical Studies and First Clinical Results.
    Muhit A; Zbijewski W; Stayman J; Thawait G; Yorkston J; Foos D; Packard N; Yang D; Senn R; Carrino J; Siewerdsen J
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part28):3973. PubMed ID: 28519605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Optimization of cone beam computed tomography image quality in implant dentistry.
    Alawaji Y; MacDonald DS; Giannelis G; Ford NL
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2018 Dec; 4(6):268-278. PubMed ID: 30603109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Development and validation of two phantoms for quality control in cone-beam CT.
    Gomes Batista WO
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Aug; 138():29-34. PubMed ID: 28764971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.