266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25593298)
21. Inadequate early social experience increases the incentive salience of reward-related cues in adulthood.
Lomanowska AM; Lovic V; Rankine MJ; Mooney SJ; Robinson TE; Kraemer GW
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 220(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 21277909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The attribution of incentive salience to Pavlovian alcohol cues: a shift from goal-tracking to sign-tracking.
Srey CS; Maddux JM; Chaudhri N
Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():54. PubMed ID: 25784867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sex and strain influence attribution of incentive salience to reward cues in mice.
Dickson PE; McNaughton KA; Hou L; Anderson LC; Long KH; Chesler EJ
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 292():305-15. PubMed ID: 26102561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Lesions of the ventral hippocampus attenuate the acquisition but not expression of sign-tracking behavior in rats.
Fitzpatrick CJ; Creeden JF; Perrine SA; Morrow JD
Hippocampus; 2016 Nov; 26(11):1424-1434. PubMed ID: 27438780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sign Tracking, but Not Goal Tracking, is Resistant to Outcome Devaluation.
Morrison SE; Bamkole MA; Nicola SM
Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():468. PubMed ID: 26733783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dopamine antagonism does not impair learning of Pavlovian conditioned approach to manipulable or non-manipulable cues but biases responding towards goal tracking.
Scülfort SA; Bartsch D; Enkel T
Behav Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 314():1-5. PubMed ID: 27478141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sign and goal tracker rats process differently the incentive salience of a conditioned stimulus.
Serrano-Barroso A; Vargas JP; Diaz E; O'Donnell P; López JC
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0223109. PubMed ID: 31568533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Individual variation in the motivational properties of a nicotine cue: sign-trackers vs. goal-trackers.
Yager LM; Robinson TE
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2015 Sep; 232(17):3149-60. PubMed ID: 25980485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Environmental enrichment reduces attribution of incentive salience to a food-associated stimulus.
Beckmann JS; Bardo MT
Behav Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 226(1):331-4. PubMed ID: 21945300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of glutamate signaling in incentive salience: second-by-second glutamate recordings in awake Sprague-Dawley rats.
Batten SR; Pomerleau F; Quintero J; Gerhardt GA; Beckmann JS
J Neurochem; 2018 May; 145(4):276-286. PubMed ID: 29315659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reward-Mediated, Model-Free Reinforcement-Learning Mechanisms in Pavlovian and Instrumental Tasks Are Related.
Moin Afshar N; Cinotti F; Martin D; Khamassi M; Calu DJ; Taylor JR; Groman SM
J Neurosci; 2023 Jan; 43(3):458-471. PubMed ID: 36216504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Individual Differences in the Attribution of Incentive Salience to a Pavlovian Alcohol Cue.
Villaruel FR; Chaudhri N
Front Behav Neurosci; 2016; 10():238. PubMed ID: 28082877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of prior amphetamine exposure on approach strategy in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in rats.
Simon NW; Mendez IA; Setlow B
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Mar; 202(4):699-709. PubMed ID: 18850090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sign-tracking behavior is sensitive to outcome devaluation in a devaluation context-dependent manner: implications for analyzing habitual behavior.
Amaya KA; Stott JJ; Smith KS
Learn Mem; 2020 Apr; 27(4):136-149. PubMed ID: 32179656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nicotine-enhanced Pavlovian conditioned approach is resistant to omission of expected outcome.
Stringfield SJ; Boettiger CA; Robinson DL
Behav Brain Res; 2018 May; 343():16-20. PubMed ID: 29407412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cannabinoid receptor-1 signaling contributions to sign-tracking and conditioned reinforcement in rats.
Bacharach SZ; Nasser HM; Zlebnik NE; Dantrassy HM; Kochli DE; Gyawali U; Cheer JF; Calu DJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Oct; 235(10):3031-3043. PubMed ID: 30109373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Premature responding is associated with approach to a food cue in male and female heterogeneous stock rats.
King CP; Palmer AA; Woods LC; Hawk LW; Richards JB; Meyer PJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2016 Jul; 233(13):2593-605. PubMed ID: 27146401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats.
Flagel SB; Watson SJ; Robinson TE; Akil H
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Apr; 191(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 16972103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sign-tracking predicts increased choice of cocaine over food in rats.
Tunstall BJ; Kearns DN
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():222-8. PubMed ID: 25541036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Drug versus sweet reward: greater attraction to and preference for sweet versus drug cues.
Madsen HB; Ahmed SH
Addict Biol; 2015 May; 20(3):433-44. PubMed ID: 24602027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
