These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25594719)

  • 1. Disclosure of experience as a risk factor in informed consent for neurosurgery: the case of Johnson v. Kokemoor.
    Banja JD
    Virtual Mentor; 2015 Jan; 17(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25594719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pushing the limits of informed consent: Johnson v. Kokemoor and physician-specific disclosure.
    Heinemann RA
    Wis L Rev; 1997; 5():1079-121. PubMed ID: 16329220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Update on informed consent law: the Johnson V. Kokemoor decision.
    Icenogle DL
    Wis Med J; 1997 Aug; 96(8):58-61. PubMed ID: 9283267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent.
    Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG
    Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practice makes perfect: experience-related information should fall within the purview of Pennsylvania's doctrine of informed consent.
    Rostolsky BM
    Duquesne Law Rev; 2002; 40(3):543-60. PubMed ID: 15212018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Broad view of necessary information in informed consent taken by Wisconsin court. Johnson by Adler v. Kokemoor.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1997 Jan; 14(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10184645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions.
    Seidelson DE
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule.
    Karlson HC; Erwin RD
    Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
    Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
    Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lepp v. Hopp; Hopp v. Lepp.
    ; ;
    Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():187-209. PubMed ID: 11645462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical malpractice: expert opinion unnecessary to establish claim based on doctrine of informed consent.
    Minn Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 63(4):695-706. PubMed ID: 11665186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Malpractice and informed consent--a legal ploy.
    DeLee ST
    Int Surg; 1976; 61(6-7):331-2. PubMed ID: 11664601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Malpractice: toward a viable disclosure standard for informed consent.
    Stansfield MP
    Oklahoma Law Rev; 1979; 32(4):868-90. PubMed ID: 11665171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medico-legal bulletin number 250: Doctrine of informed consent in malpractice law.
    Camp RC
    Med Leg Bull; 1974 Feb; 23(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 4846841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed consent: risk disclosure and the Canadian approach.
    Jazvac WP
    Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1978; 36(2):191-208. PubMed ID: 11664977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent: the patient as an individual.
    Trichter JG
    Forum; 1980; 15(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 11665241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects.
    Alsobrook HB
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The new rules on informed consent.
    Rice B
    Med Econ; 2000 Jun; 77(12):150-2, 156-7, 161-2. PubMed ID: 11010472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas.
    Cluff CA
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent.
    Penhallegon JR
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.