These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25594726)

  • 1. Potential hazards of brominated carbon sorbents for mercury emission control.
    Bisson TM; Xu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(4):2496-502. PubMed ID: 25594726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of mercury binding onto a novel brominated biomass ash sorbent by X-ray absorption spectroscopy.
    Bisson TM; MacLean LC; Hu Y; Xu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 46(21):12186-93. PubMed ID: 23020596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of mercury on a novel mineral sulfide sorbent used for efficient mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas.
    Li H; Zhang M; Zhu L; Yang J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Oct; 25(28):28583-28593. PubMed ID: 30091078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of surface changes on brominated and sulfur-treated activated carbon sorbents during mercury capture: performance of pellet versus fiber sorbents.
    Saha A; Abram DN; Kuhl KP; Paradis J; Crawford JL; Sasmaz E; Chang R; Jaramillo TF; Wilcox J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(23):13695-701. PubMed ID: 24256554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bromination of petroleum coke for elemental mercury capture.
    Xiao Y; Pudasainee D; Gupta R; Xu Z; Diao Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2017 Aug; 336():232-239. PubMed ID: 28494311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in simulated coal combustion flue gas.
    Rodríguez-Pérez J; López-Antón MA; Díaz-Somoano M; García R; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():869-77. PubMed ID: 23876255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas.
    Yang H; Xu Z; Fan M; Bland AE; Judkins RR
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 17544578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. XAS and XPS characterization of mercury binding on brominated activated carbon.
    Hutson ND; Attwood BC; Scheckel KG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(5):1747-52. PubMed ID: 17405227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential hazards of novel waste-derived sorbents for efficient removal of mercury from coal combustion flue gas.
    Xu Y; Luo G; Zhang Q; Cui W; Li Z; Zhang S
    J Hazard Mater; 2021 Jun; 412():125226. PubMed ID: 33540268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential extraction study of stability of adsorbed mercury in chemically modified activated carbons.
    Tong S; Fan M; Mao L; Jia CQ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7416-21. PubMed ID: 21812397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomass gasification chars for mercury capture from a simulated flue gas of coal combustion.
    Fuente-Cuesta A; Diaz-Somoano M; Lopez-Anton MA; Cieplik M; Fierro JL; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    J Environ Manage; 2012 May; 98():23-8. PubMed ID: 22325640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Possibilities of mercury removal in the dry flue gas cleaning lines of solid waste incineration units.
    Svoboda K; Hartman M; Šyc M; Pohořelý M; Kameníková P; Jeremiáš M; Durda T
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():499-511. PubMed ID: 26588812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulation of mercury capture by activated carbon injection in incinerator flue gas. 2. Fabric filter removal.
    Scala F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Nov; 35(21):4373-8. PubMed ID: 11718360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of increased black carbon emissions from electrostatic precipitators during powdered activated carbon injection for mercury emissions control.
    Clack HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):7327-33. PubMed ID: 22663136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The secondary release of mercury in coal fly ash-based flue-gas mercury removal technology.
    He J; Duan C; Lei M; Zhu X
    Environ Technol; 2016; 37(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 26121324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The application of regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in gas phase.
    Lopez-Anton MA; Fernández-Miranda N; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Dec; 23(24):24495-24503. PubMed ID: 27604126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel regenerable sorbent for mercury capture from flue gases of coal-fired power plant.
    Liu Y; Kelly DJ; Yang H; Lin CC; Kuznicki SM; Xu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug; 42(16):6205-10. PubMed ID: 18767688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of ammonia on mercury leaching from coal fly ash.
    Wang J; Wang T; Mallhi H; Liu Y; Ban H; Ladwig K
    Chemosphere; 2007 Nov; 69(10):1586-92. PubMed ID: 17604819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation of mercury capture by activated carbon injection in incinerator flue gas. 1. In-duct removal.
    Scala F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Nov; 35(21):4367-72. PubMed ID: 11718359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vapor-phase elemental mercury adsorption by residual carbon separated from fly ash.
    Wang LG; Chen CH; Kolker KH
    J Environ Sci (China); 2005; 17(3):518-20. PubMed ID: 16083138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.