428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25594729)
1. Surgical outcomes of modified lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kanbara S; Yukawa Y; Ito K; Machino M; Kato F
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 25594729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note.
Watanabe K; Hosoya T; Shiraishi T; Matsumoto M; Chiba K; Toyama Y
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Nov; 3(5):405-8. PubMed ID: 16302638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.
Watanabe K; Matsumoto M; Ikegami T; Nishiwaki Y; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Ogawa Y; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 21142464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article.
Nomura H; Yanagisawa Y; Arima J; Oga M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 24878270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel surgical approach to the lumbar spine involving hemilateral split-off of the spinous process to preserve the multifidus muscle: technical note.
Chatani K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 26544596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ＜Editors' Choice＞ Surgical outcomes of decompressive laminoplasty with spinous process osteotomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kanbara S; Urasaki T; Tomita H; Ando K; Kobayashi K; Ito K; Tsushima M; Matsumoto A; Morozumi M; Tanaka S; Ota K; Machino M; Ito S; Nishida Y; Ishiguro N; Imagama S
Nagoya J Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 80(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29581609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumbar Spinous Process-Splitting Laminoplasty: A Novel Technique for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
Baghdadi YM; Moussallem CD; Shuaib MA; Clarke MJ; Dekutoski MB; Nassr AN
Orthopedics; 2016 Sep; 39(5):e950-6. PubMed ID: 27337665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Results and Radiologic Changes Between Two Different Minimally Invasive Decompressive Surgical Methods for Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy and Trans-Interspinous Lumbar Decompression.
Tanaka S; Wada K; Kumagai G; Asari T; Aburakawa S; Yamasaki Y; Yokoyama T; Takeuchi K; Ishibashi Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Nov; 46(21):E1136-E1145. PubMed ID: 33813582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Restoration of the Spinous Process Following Muscle-Preserving Posterior Lumbar Decompression via Sagittal Splitting of the Spinous Process.
Wi SM; Lee HJ; Chang SY; Kwon OH; Lee CK; Chang BS; Kim H
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 30838113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 2D Operative Video.
Gagliardi M; Guiroy A; Sícoli A; Masanés NG; Ciancio AM; Asghar J
World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():107. PubMed ID: 34971829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiological Analysis of Minimally Invasive Microscopic Laminectomy for Lumbar Canal Stenosis with a Focus on Multilevel Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis.
Awaya T; Nishimura Y; Eguchi K; Nagashima Y; Ando R; Akahori S; Yoshikawa S; Haimoto S; Hara M; Takayasu M; Saito R
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e224-e234. PubMed ID: 35483569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Spinous Process Integrity on Ten to Twelve-Year Outcomes After Posterior Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Study of Open-Door Laminoplasty Using a Spinous Process-Splitting Approach.
Kakiuchi M; Fukushima W
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Oct; 97(20):1667-77. PubMed ID: 26491131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spinous process splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a critical appraisal.
Lee DY; Lee SH
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 18683110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Modified Marmot Surgery and Lumbar Spinous Process Splitting Laminectomy in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Two-Year Outcomes.
Masuda K; Shigematsu H; Tanaka M; Kawasaki S; Suga Y; Yamamoto Y; Iwata E; Okuda A; Tanaka Y
Spine Surg Relat Res; 2021; 5(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 34179553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors associated with improvement in sagittal spinal alignment after microendoscopic laminotomy in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Takahashi S; Matsumoto T; Suzuki A; Terai H; Nakamura H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jul; 25(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 26967988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified fenestration with restorative spinoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Matsudaira K; Yamazaki T; Seichi A; Hoshi K; Hara N; Ogiwara S; Terayama S; Chikuda H; Takeshita K; Nakamura K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jun; 10(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 19558293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report.
Cho DY; Lin HL; Lee WY; Lee HC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 17355022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
