These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25595241)

  • 1. Measuring change in quality of life: bias in prospective and retrospective evaluation.
    Blome C; Augustin M
    Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 25595241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a retrospective pretest instead of a conventional pretest is replacing biases: a qualitative study of cognitive processes underlying responses to thentest items.
    Taminiau-Bloem EF; Schwartz CE; van Zuuren FJ; Koeneman MA; Visser MR; Tishelman C; Koning CC; Sprangers MA
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1327-37. PubMed ID: 26573019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are retrospective measures of change in quality of life more valid than prospective measures?
    Nieuwkerk PT; Tollenaar MS; Oort FJ; Sprangers MA
    Med Care; 2007 Mar; 45(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 17304076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift.
    Oort FJ; Visser MR; Sprangers MA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1126-37. PubMed ID: 19540722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recall bias did not affect perceived magnitude of change in health-related functional status.
    Middel B; Goudriaan H; de Greef M; Stewart R; van Sonderen E; Bouma J; de Jongste M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 May; 59(5):503-11. PubMed ID: 16632139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recall bias in melanoma risk factors and measurement error effects: a nested case-control study within the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.
    Parr CL; Hjartåker A; Laake P; Lund E; Veierød MB
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 169(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 19011116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recall of pretreatment symptoms among men treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
    Fransson P
    Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 16120544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response shift, recall bias and their effect on measuring change in health-related quality of life amongst older hospital patients.
    McPhail S; Haines T
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2010 Jul; 8():65. PubMed ID: 20618978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest: a mixed methods investigation.
    Schwartz CE; Rapkin BD
    Qual Life Res; 2012 Apr; 21(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 21969088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: a convergent validity study.
    Visser MR; Oort FJ; Sprangers MA
    Qual Life Res; 2005 Apr; 14(3):629-39. PubMed ID: 16022057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inconsistency between prospectively and retrospectively reported febrile seizures.
    Sillanpää M; Camfield PR; Camfield CS; Aromaa M; Helenius H; Rautava P; Hauser WA
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Jan; 50(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 18173625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective global measure, the Punum Ladder, provides more valid assessments of quality of life than a retrospective transition measure.
    Fletcher KE; French CT; Irwin RS; Corapi KM; Norman GR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1123-31. PubMed ID: 20303709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest.
    Schwartz CE; Sprangers MA
    Qual Life Res; 2010 May; 19(4):455-64. PubMed ID: 20084465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In prospective study using Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire the recall bias had the same magnitude as the minimally important difference.
    Lurie F; Kistner RL
    Qual Life Res; 2011 Dec; 20(10):1589-93. PubMed ID: 21487933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Great expectations? Pre-transplant quality of life expectations and distress after kidney transplantation: a prospective study.
    Schulz T; Niesing J; Homan van der Heide JJ; Westerhuis R; Ploeg RJ; Ranchor AV
    Br J Health Psychol; 2014 Nov; 19(4):823-38. PubMed ID: 24330416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individualized vs. global assessments of quality of life after head injury and their susceptibility to response shift.
    Blair H; Wilson L; Gouick J; Gentleman D
    Brain Inj; 2010; 24(6):833-43. PubMed ID: 20433289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A valence-dependent group-specific recall bias of retrospective self-reports: a study of borderline personality disorder in everyday life.
    Ebner-Priemer UW; Kuo J; Welch SS; Thielgen T; Witte S; Bohus M; Linehan MM
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Oct; 194(10):774-9. PubMed ID: 17041290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring nightmare and bad dream frequency: impact of retrospective and prospective instruments.
    Robert G; Zadra A
    J Sleep Res; 2008 Jun; 17(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 18482103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the outcome of interventions on quality of life in dementia: selection of the appropriate scale.
    Schölzel-Dorenbos CJ; Ettema TP; Bos J; Boelens-van der Knoop E; Gerritsen DL; Hoogeveen F; de Lange J; Meihuizen L; Dröes RM
    Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 22(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 17133655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.