These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25595586)

  • 1. Examining the variations in the results of the Hotelling T
    Ercan I; Sigirli D; Ozkaya G
    Interdiscip Sci; 2015 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 25595586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining the Variations in the Results of the Hotelling T (2) Test in Case of Changing Baseline Landmarks in the Bookstein Coordinates.
    Ercan I; Sigirli D; Ozkaya G
    Interdiscip Sci; 2015 Jun; 7(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 26199212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Landmark Typology in Applied Morphometrics Studies: What's the Point?
    Wärmländer SKTS; Garvin H; Guyomarc'h P; Petaros A; Sholts SB
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2019 Jul; 302(7):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 30365240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics].
    Pavlinov IIa; Mikeshina NG
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2002; 63(6):473-93. PubMed ID: 12510587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of scalation landmarks in geometric morphometrics of squamate reptiles: a comment on homology.
    Meik JM; Lawing AM; Watson JA
    Zootaxa; 2020 Jul; 4816(3):zootaxa.4816.3.12. PubMed ID: 33055700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics.
    Rohlf FJ
    J Hum Evol; 2003 Jun; 44(6):665-83. PubMed ID: 12799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement error in μCT-based three-dimensional geometric morphometrics introduced by surface generation and landmark data acquisition.
    Engelkes K; Helfsgott J; Hammel JU; Büsse S; Kleinteich T; Beerlink A; Gorb SN; Haas A
    J Anat; 2019 Aug; 235(2):357-378. PubMed ID: 31062345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.
    Percival CJ; Devine J; Darwin BC; Liu W; van Eede M; Henkelman RM; Hallgrimsson B
    J Anat; 2019 Jun; 234(6):917-935. PubMed ID: 30901082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
    Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study.
    Durão AP; Morosolli A; Pittayapat P; Bolstad N; Ferreira AP; Jacobs R
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Dec; 45(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 26730368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of Resolution and Texture of Laser Scanning Generated Three-Dimensional Models on Landmark Identification.
    Toneva D; Nikolova S; Georgiev I; Lazarov N
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2020 Jul; 303(7):1950-1965. PubMed ID: 31577844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Representation of visual landmarks in retrosplenial cortex.
    Fischer LF; Mojica Soto-Albors R; Buck F; Harnett MT
    Elife; 2020 Mar; 9():. PubMed ID: 32154781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microevolution in Miocene Brizalina (Foraminifera) studied by canonical variate analysis and analysis of landmarks.
    Bookstein FL; Reyment RA
    Bull Math Biol; 1989; 51(6):657-79. PubMed ID: 2819278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape.
    Bookstein FL
    Med Image Anal; 1997 Apr; 1(3):225-43. PubMed ID: 9873908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing landmark redundancy for sex-based shape analysis of the adult human os coxa.
    Robertson HI; Pokotylo DL; Weston DA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Aug; 169(4):689-703. PubMed ID: 31155703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods.
    Rohlf FJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2000 Apr; 111(4):463-78. PubMed ID: 10727966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-Density Morphometric Analysis of Shape and Integration: The Good, the Bad, and the Not-Really-a-Problem.
    Goswami A; Watanabe A; Felice RN; Bardua C; Fabre AC; Polly PD
    Integr Comp Biol; 2019 Sep; 59(3):669-683. PubMed ID: 31243431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthognathic surgery outcome analysis: 3-dimensional landmark geometric morphometrics.
    Cakirer B; Dean D; Palomo JM; Hans MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(2):116-32. PubMed ID: 12099316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of the sella turcica landmark in three dimensions using a sella turcica-specific reference system.
    Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Odri GA; Vasconcelos Kde F; Willems G; Olszewski R
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2015 Mar; 45(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25793179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.