2227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25596143)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease?
Joutsiniemi E; Saraste A; Pietilä M; Mäki M; Kajander S; Ukkonen H; Airaksinen J; Knuuti J
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 24408930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol.
Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Gama V
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 26869367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic performance of SPECT-MPI to predict functional significant coronary artery disease by fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA (FFR
Nakanishi R; Osawa K; Ceponiene I; Huth G; Cole J; Kim M; Nezarat N; Rahmani S; Li D; Gupta S; Rogers C; Dailing C; Budoff MJ
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2067-2072. PubMed ID: 28699019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomical and Functional Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis.
Celeng C; Leiner T; Maurovich-Horvat P; Merkely B; de Jong P; Dankbaar JW; van Es HW; Ghoshhajra BB; Hoffmann U; Takx RAP
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 12(7 Pt 2):1316-1325. PubMed ID: 30219398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease between cardiac magnetic resonance and nuclear medical imaging: A meta-analysis.
Yang K; Yu SQ; Lu MJ; Zhao SH
Int J Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 293():278-285. PubMed ID: 31303392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Testing in Stable Patients With Intermediate-Range Coronary Lesions: Influence on Downstream Diagnostic Workflows and Invasive Angiography Findings.
Nørgaard BL; Gormsen LC; Bøtker HE; Parner E; Nielsen LH; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Pedersen K; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Mæng M; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Lassen JF; Jensen JM
J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Aug; 6(8):. PubMed ID: 28862968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of myocardial transmural perfusion gradient by magnetic resonance imaging to fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Pan J; Huang S; Lu Z; Li J; Wan Q; Zhang J; Gao C; Yang X; Wei M
Am J Cardiol; 2015 May; 115(10):1333-40. PubMed ID: 25796365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis.
Rizvi A; Han D; Danad I; Ó Hartaigh B; Lee JH; Gransar H; Stuijfzand WJ; Roudsari HM; Park MW; Szymonifka J; Chang HJ; Jones EC; Knaapen P; Lin FY; Min JK; Peña JM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 11(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 28823745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of static CT perfusion for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sørgaard MH; Kofoed KF; Linde JJ; George RT; Rochitte CE; Feuchtner G; Lima JA; Abdulla J
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(6):450-457. PubMed ID: 27773634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Assessing Hemodynamically Significant Native Coronary Artery Lesions.
Sethi P; Panchal HB; Veeranki SP; Ur Rahman Z; Mamudu H; Paul TK
Am J Med Sci; 2017 Sep; 354(3):291-298. PubMed ID: 28918837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging.
Danad I; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Heymans MW; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; James S; Sörensen J; Knaapen P; Knuuti J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 64(14):1464-75. PubMed ID: 25277618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.
Gonzalez JA; Lipinski MJ; Flors L; Shaw PW; Kramer CM; Salerno M
Am J Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 116(9):1469-78. PubMed ID: 26347004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve.
Hulten E; Ahmadi A; Blankstein R
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 57(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 25770850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
