These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

748 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25596422)

  • 1. Exceeding chance level by chance: The caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy.
    Combrisson E; Jerbi K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 250():126-36. PubMed ID: 25596422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multivariate pattern analysis for MEG: A comparison of dissimilarity measures.
    Guggenmos M; Sterzer P; Cichy RM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():434-447. PubMed ID: 29499313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification methods for ongoing EEG and MEG signals.
    Besserve M; Jerbi K; Laurent F; Baillet S; Martinerie J; Garnero L
    Biol Res; 2007; 40(4):415-37. PubMed ID: 18575676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Channel selection and classification of electroencephalogram signals: an artificial neural network and genetic algorithm-based approach.
    Yang J; Singh H; Hines EL; Schlaghecken F; Iliescu DD; Leeson MS; Stocks NG
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jun; 55(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 22503644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning machines and sleeping brains: Automatic sleep stage classification using decision-tree multi-class support vector machines.
    Lajnef T; Chaibi S; Ruby P; Aguera PE; Eichenlaub JB; Samet M; Kachouri A; Jerbi K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 250():94-105. PubMed ID: 25629798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Designing a robust feature extraction method based on optimum allocation and principal component analysis for epileptic EEG signal classification.
    Siuly S; Li Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Apr; 119(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 25704869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clustering linear discriminant analysis for MEG-based brain computer interfaces.
    Zhang J; Sudre G; Li X; Wang W; Weber DJ; Bagic A
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Jun; 19(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 21342856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved multi-unit decoding at the brain-machine interface using population temporal linear filtering.
    Herzfeld DJ; Beardsley SA
    J Neural Eng; 2010 Aug; 7(4):046012. PubMed ID: 20644245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of classifiers for developing an adaptive computer-assisted EEG analysis system for diagnosing epilepsy.
    Ahmad MA; Ayaz Y; Jamil M; Omer Gillani S; Rasheed MB; Imran M; Khan NA; Majeed W; Javaid N
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():638036. PubMed ID: 25834822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces: a 10 year update.
    Lotte F; Bougrain L; Cichocki A; Clerc M; Congedo M; Rakotomamonjy A; Yger F
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Jun; 15(3):031005. PubMed ID: 29488902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of linear, nonlinear, and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification.
    Garrett D; Peterson DA; Anderson CW; Thaut MH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Jun; 11(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 12899257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Research on magnetoencephalography-brain computer interface based on the PCA and LDA data reduction].
    Wang J; Zhou L
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Dec; 28(6):1069-74. PubMed ID: 22295687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class imbalance should not throw you off balance: Choosing the right classifiers and performance metrics for brain decoding with imbalanced data.
    Thölke P; Mantilla-Ramos YJ; Abdelhedi H; Maschke C; Dehgan A; Harel Y; Kemtur A; Mekki Berrada L; Sahraoui M; Young T; Bellemare Pépin A; El Khantour C; Landry M; Pascarella A; Hadid V; Combrisson E; O'Byrne J; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2023 Aug; 277():120253. PubMed ID: 37385392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal spatial filtering for brain oscillatory activity using the Relevance Vector Machine.
    Belardinelli P; Jalava A; Gross J; Kujala J; Salmelin R
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):357-69. PubMed ID: 23729235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretable many-class decoding for MEG.
    Csaky R; van Es MWJ; Jones OP; Woolrich M
    Neuroimage; 2023 Nov; 282():120396. PubMed ID: 37805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canonical Polyadic Decomposition With Auxiliary Information for Brain-Computer Interface.
    Li J; Li C; Cichocki A
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Jan; 21(1):263-271. PubMed ID: 26485727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decoding Brain States Based on Magnetoencephalography From Prespecified Cortical Regions.
    Zhang J; Li X; Foldes ST; Wang W; Collinger JL; Weber DJ; Bagić A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jan; 63(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 26699648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards brain-activity-controlled information retrieval: Decoding image relevance from MEG signals.
    Kauppi JP; Kandemir M; Saarinen VM; Hirvenkari L; Parkkonen L; Klami A; Hari R; Kaski S
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():288-298. PubMed ID: 25595505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic and robust noise suppression in EEG and MEG: The SOUND algorithm.
    Mutanen TP; Metsomaa J; Liljander S; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 166():135-151. PubMed ID: 29061529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.