BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25597549)

  • 21. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children.
    Sankaridurg P; He X; Naduvilath T; Lv M; Ho A; Smith E; Erickson P; Zhu J; Zou H; Xu X
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 95(7):e633-e640. PubMed ID: 29110438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Refraction in children: a comparison of two methods of accommodation control.
    Hopkins S; Sampson GP; Hendicott P; Lacherez P; Wood JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1734-9. PubMed ID: 23142881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
    Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effectiveness of an autorefractor with eye-tracking capability in pediatric patients.
    Kirschen D; Isenberg SJ
    J AAPOS; 2014 Jun; 18(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 24924271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Refractive errors in an urban population in Southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study.
    Dandona R; Dandona L; Naduvilath TJ; Srinivas M; McCarty CA; Rao GN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Nov; 40(12):2810-8. PubMed ID: 10549640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Noncycloplegic Compared with Cycloplegic Refraction in a Chicago School-Aged Population.
    Guo X; Shakarchi AF; Block SS; Friedman DS; Repka MX; Collins ME
    Ophthalmology; 2022 Jul; 129(7):813-820. PubMed ID: 35245603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the agreement of non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children.
    Wilson S; Ctori I; Shah R; Suttle C; Conway ML
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Nov; 42(6):1276-1288. PubMed ID: 35913773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response: Cycloplegia in refraction: age and cycloplegics.
    Sanfilippo PG; Chu BS; Bigault O; Kearns LS; Boon MY; Young TL; Hammond CJ; Hewitt AW; Mackey DA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e373. PubMed ID: 27167468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.
    Rauscher FG; Lange H; Yahiaoui-Doktor M; Tegetmeyer H; Sterker I; Hinz A; Wahl S; Wiedemann P; Ohlendorf A; Blendowske R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):879-889. PubMed ID: 31703049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of different autorefractors with retinoscopy in children.
    Oral Y; Gunaydin N; Ozgur O; Arsan AK; Oskan S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2012; 49(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22938517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prevalence of the refractive errors by age and gender: the Mashhad eye study of Iran.
    Ostadimoghaddam H; Fotouhi A; Hashemi H; Yekta A; Heravian J; Rezvan F; Ghadimi H; Rezvan B; Khabazkhoob M
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 39(8):743-51. PubMed ID: 21631683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Full optical correction after cycloplegia in headache].
    Jeddi A; Ben Hadj Alouane W; Hammoud M; Malouch N; Zghal I; Ayed S; Zouari B
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2002 Mar; 25(3):270-3. PubMed ID: 11941253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Cyclopentolate on Ocular Biometric Components.
    Hashemi H; Asharlous A; Khabazkhoob M; Iribarren R; Khosravi A; Yekta A; Emamian MH; Fotouhi A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 97(6):440-447. PubMed ID: 32511166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-term refractive change and ocular parameter changes after cycloplegia.
    Cheng HC; Hsieh YT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1113-7. PubMed ID: 25036542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of cycloplegia at 20- and 30-minutes following proxymetacaine and cyclopentolate instillation in white 12-13-year-olds.
    Doyle M; O' Dwyer V; Harrington S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Nov; 106(8):890-895. PubMed ID: 36750050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mean cycloplegic refractive error in emmetropic adults - The Tehran Eye Study.
    Rozema JJ; Iribarren R; Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Fotouhi A
    J Optom; 2024; 17(3):100512. PubMed ID: 38244522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in children.
    Chat SW; Edwards MH
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 11261351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the Near Eye Tool for Refractive Assessment (NETRA) and non-cycloplegic subjective refraction.
    Hasrod N; Rubin A
    BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2022; 7(1):e000851. PubMed ID: 35452206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A randomized clinical trial using cyclopentolate and tropicamide to compare cycloplegic refraction in Chinese young adults with dark irises.
    Pei R; Liu Z; Rong H; Zhao L; Du B; Jin N; Zhang H; Wang B; Pang Y; Wei R
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):256. PubMed ID: 34112149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in ocular biometrics following cycloplegic refraction in strabismic and amblyopic children.
    Jo E; Kim SM; Kim JM; Han SY
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 May; 103(20):e38143. PubMed ID: 38758890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.