244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25598007)
21. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Parametric EIT for monitoring cardiac stroke volume.
Zlochiver S; Freimark D; Arad M; Adunsky A; Abboud S
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S139-46. PubMed ID: 16636406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Estimation of anomaly location and size using electrical impedance tomography.
Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK; Woo EJ; Cho YG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 12617528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. EIT reconstructions and Faddeev solutions for a numerically simulated phantom chest.
Mueller JL
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():213-8. PubMed ID: 15133960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Image reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography based on genetic algorithm].
Hou W; Mo Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 20(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 12744177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography for small anomalies using boundary conditions: A simulation study.
Lee J; Choi N; Seo JK; Kim DH
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4773-4785. PubMed ID: 28508476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Unveiling the development of intracranial injury using dynamic brain EIT: an evaluation of current reconstruction algorithms.
Li H; Chen R; Xu C; Liu B; Tang M; Yang L; Dong X; Fu F
Physiol Meas; 2017 Aug; 38(9):1776-1790. PubMed ID: 28714853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of two EIT systems suitable for imaging impedance changes in epilepsy.
Fabrizi L; McEwan A; Oh T; Woo EJ; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S103-20. PubMed ID: 19491447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. High-resolution conductivity reconstruction by electrical impedance tomography using structure-aware hybrid-fusion learning.
Yu H; Liu H; Liu Z; Wang Z; Jia J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2024 Jan; 243():107861. PubMed ID: 37931580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Direct estimation of Cole parameters in multifrequency EIT using a regularized Gauss-Newton method.
Brandstätter B; Hollaus K; Hutten H; Mayer M; Merwa R; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2003 May; 24(2):437-48. PubMed ID: 12812428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison framework for temporal image reconstructions in electrical impedance tomography.
Gagnon H; Grychtol B; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1093-107. PubMed ID: 26006181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noninvasive imaging of bioimpedance distribution by means of current reconstruction magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
Gao N; He B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 May; 55(5):1530-8. PubMed ID: 18440899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Incorporating a Spatial Prior into Nonlinear D-Bar EIT Imaging for Complex Admittivities.
Hamilton SJ; Mueller JL; Alsaker M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36(2):457-466. PubMed ID: 28114061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spatial resolution improvement of 3D EIT images by the shrinking sLORETA-FOCUSS algorithm.
Dong G; Liu H; Bayford RH; Yerworth R; Schimpf PH; Yan W
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S199-208. PubMed ID: 15798233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A novel time-difference electrical impedance tomography algorithm using multi-frequency information.
Cao L; Li H; Xu C; Dai M; Ji Z; Shi X; Dong X; Fu F; Yang B
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Jul; 18(1):84. PubMed ID: 31358013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Induced current electrical impedance tomography system: experimental results and numerical simulations.
Zlochiver S; Radai MM; Abboud S; Rosenfeld M; Dong XZ; Liu RG; You FS; Xiang HY; Shi XT
Physiol Meas; 2004 Feb; 25(1):239-55. PubMed ID: 15005319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Image Reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography Based on Structure-Aware Sparse Bayesian Learning.
Liu S; Jia J; Zhang YD; Yang Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2090-2102. PubMed ID: 29994084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images.
Khang HS; Lee BI; Oh SH; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Cho MH; Kwon O; Yoon JR; Seo JK
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):695-702. PubMed ID: 12166867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
