These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25598007)

  • 41. Aortic blood pressure measured via EIT: investigation of different measurement settings.
    Braun F; Proença M; Rapin M; Lemay M; Adler A; Grychtol B; Solà J; Thiran JP
    Physiol Meas; 2015 Jun; 36(6):1147-59. PubMed ID: 26007662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Validation of a 3D reconstruction algorithm for EIT of human brain function in a realistic head-shaped tank.
    Tidswell AT; Gibson A; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Physiol Meas; 2001 Feb; 22(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 11236878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
    Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Metherall P; Barber DC; Smallwood RH; Brown BH
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6574):509-12. PubMed ID: 8606768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography.
    Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Apr; 45(4):486-93. PubMed ID: 9556965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
    Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Direct EIT reconstructions of complex admittivities on a chest-shaped domain in 2-D.
    Hamilton SJ; Mueller JL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Apr; 32(4):757-69. PubMed ID: 23314771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Anatomically constrained electrical impedance tomography for three-dimensional anisotropic bodies.
    Glidewell ME; Ng KT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):572-80. PubMed ID: 9368112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S13-27. PubMed ID: 17664631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Multifrequency electrical impedance tomography using spectral constraints.
    Malone E; Sato Dos Santos G; Holder D; Arridge S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Feb; 33(2):340-50. PubMed ID: 24122550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
    Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
    Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An Efficient Point-Matching Method-of-Moments for 2D and 3D Electrical Impedance Tomography Using Radial Basis Functions.
    Dimas C; Uzunoglu N; Sotiriadis PP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Feb; 69(2):783-794. PubMed ID: 34398750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Non-invasive imaging of neural activity with magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography (MDEIT): a modelling study.
    Mason K; Aristovich K; Holder D
    Physiol Meas; 2023 Nov; 44(11):. PubMed ID: 37832564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Bladder volume estimation from electrical impedance tomography.
    Schlebusch T; Nienke S; Leonhardt S; Walter M
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Sep; 35(9):1813-23. PubMed ID: 25139037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [A hybrid reconstruction method in electrical impedance tomography based on GMRES and Tikhonov regularization].
    Wang H; Fan W; Hu L
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 26(4):701-5. PubMed ID: 19813592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Optimal distance of multi-plane sensor in three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography.
    Hao Z; Yue S; Sun B; Wang H
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2017 Dec; 22(sup1):326-338. PubMed ID: 29037075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation and real-time monitoring of data quality in electrical impedance tomography.
    Mamatjan Y; Grychtol B; Gaggero P; Justiz J; Koch VM; Adler A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1997-2005. PubMed ID: 23799682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reducing computational costs in large scale 3D EIT by using a sparse Jacobian matrix with block-wise CGLS reconstruction.
    Yang CL; Wei HY; Adler A; Soleimani M
    Physiol Meas; 2013 Jun; 34(6):645-58. PubMed ID: 23719094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm.
    Kwon O; Woo EJ; Yoon JR; Seo JK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Feb; 49(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12066883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.