These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Navigation systems and platforms in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Karimyan V; Sodergren M; Clark J; Yang GZ; Darzi A Int J Surg; 2009 Aug; 7(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 19481186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technology improvements for image-guided and minimally invasive spine procedures. Cleary K; Clifford M; Stoianovici D; Freedman M; Mun SK; Watson V IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2002 Dec; 6(4):249-61. PubMed ID: 15224839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vision-based navigation in image-guided interventions. Mirota DJ; Ishii M; Hager GD Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2011 Aug; 13():297-319. PubMed ID: 21568713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EndoCAS navigator platform: a common platform for computer and robotic assistance in minimally invasive surgery. Megali G; Ferrari V; Freschi C; Morabito B; Cavallo F; Turini G; Troia E; Cappelli C; Pietrabissa A; Tonet O; Cuschieri A; Dario P; Mosca F Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 18698670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Establishing the case for minimally invasive, robotic-assisted CABG in the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Jones B; Desai P; Poston R Heart Surg Forum; 2009 Jun; 12(3):E147-9. PubMed ID: 19546065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Future of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery. Goldberg JL; Hussain I; Sommer F; Härtl R; Elowitz E World Neurosurg; 2022 Jul; 163():233-240. PubMed ID: 35729825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multimedia electronic patient record (ePR) system for image-assisted minimally invasive spinal surgery. Documet J; Le A; Liu B; Chiu J; Huang HK Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 May; 5(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 20033507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Development of Augmented Reality to Enhance Minimally Invasive Surgery. Dodd K; Brooks NP Surg Technol Int; 2017 Dec; 31():19-24. PubMed ID: 29301165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI-guided laparoscopic and robotic surgery for malignancies. Hashizume M Int J Clin Oncol; 2007 Apr; 12(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 17443276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Phee SJ; Low SC; Huynh VA; Kencana AP; Sun ZL; Yang K Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1192-5. PubMed ID: 19963992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic laparoendoscopy single site surgery: a transdisciplinary review. Balaphas A; Hagen ME; Buchs NC; Pugin F; Volonté F; Inan I; Morel P Int J Med Robot; 2013 Mar; 9(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 22711444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted transoral surgery with flexible robotics and navigation technologies: a review of recent progress and research challenges. Ren H; Lim CM; Wang J; Liu W; Song S; Li Z; Herbert G; Tse ZT; Tan Z Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2013; 41(4-5):365-91. PubMed ID: 24941414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolution and simplified terminology of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), and mini-laparoscopy (ML). Georgiou AN; Rassweiler J; Herrmann TR; Stolzenburg JU; Liatsikos EN; Do EM; Kallidonis P; de la Teille A; van Velthoven R; Burchardt M World J Urol; 2012 Oct; 30(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 22790450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]