These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25599267)

  • 1. Commission errors of active intentions: the roles of aging, cognitive load, and practice.
    Boywitt CD; Rummel J; Meiser T
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(5):560-76. PubMed ID: 25599267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forgetting no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions is (sometimes) harder with age but easier with forgetting practice.
    Bugg JM; Scullin MK; Rauvola RS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Jun; 31(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 27064599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors.
    Matos P; Santos FH; Albuquerque PB
    Memory; 2020 Mar; 28(3):374-385. PubMed ID: 32043427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1423-1438. PubMed ID: 27172855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of age, enactment, and cue-action relatedness on memory for intentions in the Virtual Week task.
    Pereira A; Ellis JA; Freeman JE
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012 Sep; 19(5):549-65. PubMed ID: 22221208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of cue salience in prospective memory commission errors in nonperformed nonfocal tasks.
    Mello B; Matos P; Albuquerque PB
    Cogn Process; 2024 Aug; 25(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 38632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors.
    Bugg JM; Scullin MK; McDaniel MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):522-7. PubMed ID: 23355044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commission errors with forced response lag.
    Schaper P; Grundgeiger T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2380-2392. PubMed ID: 30862247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The best of both worlds: emotional cues improve prospective memory execution and reduce repetition errors.
    May CP; Manning M; Einstein GO; Becker L; Owens M
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2015; 22(3):357-75. PubMed ID: 25175608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Implementation Intentions on Prospective Memory Commission Errors under Different Cognitive Loads.
    Guo Y; Gan J; Ding Y; Li Y
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37504049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute stress shifts the balance between controlled and automatic processes in prospective memory.
    Möschl M; Walser M; Plessow F; Goschke T; Fischer R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 Oct; 144():53-67. PubMed ID: 28625494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whoops, I did it again: commission errors in prospective memory.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM; McDaniel MA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 22082015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults' prospective memory.
    Ballhausen N; Schnitzspahn KM; Horn SS; Kliegel M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1113-1125. PubMed ID: 28600628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Failing to forget: prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):965-71. PubMed ID: 22799284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm.
    Walser M; Fischer R; Goschke T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 22288817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlling intentions: the surprising ease of stopping after going relative to stopping after never having gone.
    Bugg JM; Scullin MK
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2463-71. PubMed ID: 24091550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intention deactivation: effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions.
    Walser M; Goschke T; Möschl M; Fischer R
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):961-981. PubMed ID: 27522398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age differences in prospective memory for everyday life intentions: A diary approach.
    Schnitzspahn KM; Scholz U; Ballhausen N; Hering A; Ihle A; Lagner P; Kliegel M
    Memory; 2016; 24(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 25750997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective memory errors in everyday life: does instruction matter?
    Haas M; Zuber S; Kliegel M; Ballhausen N
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 31893967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.