These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

695 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25599513)

  • 1. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial).
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Suaris T; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 26176654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
    Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2023; 23(9):1-293. PubMed ID: 39364436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial.
    Weigel S; Gerss J; Hense HW; Krischke M; Sommer A; Czwoydzinski J; Lenzen H; Kerschke L; Spieker K; Dickmaenken S; Baier S; Urban M; Hecht G; Heidinger O; Kieschke J; Heindel W
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e020475. PubMed ID: 29764880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
    Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
    Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
    Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
    Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
    Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
    Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Reader Performance with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Vary according to Experience with Two-dimensional Mammography?
    Tucker L; Gilbert FJ; Astley SM; Dibden A; Seth A; Morel J; Bundred S; Litherland J; Klassen H; Lip G; Purushothaman H; Dobson HM; McClure L; Skippage P; Stoner K; Kissin C; Beetles U; Lim YY; Hurley E; Goligher J; Rahim R; Gagliardi TJ; Suaris T; Duffy SW
    Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28287917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
    Mall S; Noakes J; Kossoff M; Lee W; McKessar M; Goy A; Duncombe J; Roberts M; Giuffre B; Miller A; Bhola N; Kapoor C; Shearman C; DaCosta G; Choi S; Sterba J; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Donohue K; Macdonell-Scott B; Klijnsma F; Suzuki K; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5182-5194. PubMed ID: 29846804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital breast tomosynthesis compared to diagnostic mammographic projections (including magnification) among women recalled at screening mammography: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).
    Canelo-Aybar C; Carrera L; Beltrán J; Posso M; Rigau D; Lebeau A; Gräwingholt A; Castells X; Langendam M; Pérez E; Giorgi Rossi P; Van Engen R; Parmelli E; Saz-Parkinson Z; Alonso-Coello P
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(7):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 33675147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
    Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.