These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25599884)

  • 1. Comparison of the boomerang wire vascular access management system versus manual compression alone during percutaneous diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures: The boomerang™ wire vascular access management trial II.
    Goswami NJ; Smalling RG; Sinha S; Gammon RS; Ramaiah VG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jan; 87(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 25599884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized, pivotal trial of a novel extravascular collagen-based closure device compared to manual compression in diagnostic and interventional patients.
    Hermiller JB; Leimbach W; Gammon R; Karas SP; Whitbourn RJ; Wong SC; Goswami N; McCabe J; Cavros NG; Paulus R; Naidu SS; Turi ZG
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 27(3):129-36. PubMed ID: 25740963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial).
    Wong SC; Bachinsky W; Cambier P; Stoler R; Aji J; Rogers JH; Hermiller J; Nair R; Hutman H; Wang H;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):785-93. PubMed ID: 19695549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures.
    Cox T; Blair L; Huntington C; Lincourt A; Sing R; Heniford BT
    Surg Technol Int; 2015 Nov; 27():32-44. PubMed ID: 26680377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a novel vascular closure device to manual compression in anticoagulated patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral procedures: The CELT ACD trial.
    Wong SC; Laule M; Turi Z; Sanad W; Crowley J; Degen H; Bennett K; Coleman JE; Bergman G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):756-765. PubMed ID: 28296003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the boomerang wire vascular access management system versus manual compression alone during percutaneous diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures.
    Echeverria A; Krajcer Z
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jan; 87(1):82. PubMed ID: 27410956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The CLOSER trial: a multi-center study on the clinical safety and effectiveness of Closer
    Wong SC; Gammon R; Bachinsky W; O'Shaughnessy C; Leimbach W; Bernardo N; Cavros N; Jaff MR; Liu PY; Bergman G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):798-805. PubMed ID: 28833996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Dahal K; Rijal J; Shahukhal R; Sharma S; Watti H; Azrin M; Katikaneni P; Jimenez E; Tandon N; Modi K; Lee J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 28941744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AbsorbaSeal™ Vascular Closure Device: A Novel Device for Hemostasis Following Interventional Peripheral Vascular Procedures.
    Benham E; Deloose K; Callaert J; Bosiers M; Cox T; Lincourt A; Heniford BT
    Surg Technol Int; 2017 Oct; 31():93-99. PubMed ID: 29020709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial experience with the Cardiva Boomerang vascular closure device in diagnostic catheterization.
    Doyle BJ; Godfrey MJ; Lennon RJ; Ryan JL; Bresnahan JF; Rihal CS; Ting HH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Feb; 69(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 17195965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angioseal VIP® vs. StarClose SE® closure devices: a comparative analysis in non-cardiological procedures.
    Lucatelli P; Fanelli F; Cannavale A; Corona M; Cirelli C; D'Adamo A; Salvatori FM; Catalano C
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Feb; 58(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 24309473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Retrospective Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of EXOSEAL Vascular Closure Device to Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Transbrachial Procedures.
    Wei X; Han T; Sun Y; Sun X; Wu Y; Wang S; Zhou J; Zhao Z; Jing Z
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2020 Jan; 62():310-317. PubMed ID: 31449959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices.
    Duffin DC; Muhlestein JB; Allisson SB; Horne BD; Fowles RE; Sorensen SG; Revenaugh JR; Bair TL; Lappe DL
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 May; 13(5):354-62. PubMed ID: 11385148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a novel access technology for femoral artery catheterization: results of the RECITAL trial.
    Turi ZG; Wortham DC; Sampognaro GC; Kresock FD; Held JS; Smith RD; Veerina KK; Hinohara T; Kaki A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 25(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 23293169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Multiple Access Electrophysiology Procedures: The AMBULATE Trial.
    Natale A; Mohanty S; Liu PY; Mittal S; Al-Ahmad A; De Lurgio DB; Horton R; Spear W; Bailey S; Bunch J; Musat D; O'Neill P; Compton S; Turakhia MP;
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 6(1):111-124. PubMed ID: 31971899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First human experience of thermal arterial closure.
    Davidson LJ; Luna J; Virmani R; Asscher JA; Davidson CJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 84(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23934606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.
    Klein-Wiele O; Baliota M; Kara K; Käunicke M; Schäfer H; Garbrecht M; Abdulghafor M; Garmer M; Hailer B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and efficacy study of the wound care 360° SiteSeal® vascular closure device in percutaneous cardiac catheterization procedures.
    Sharma S; Patel N; Jeevanantham V; Gupta K; Earnest MB
    Vascular; 2021 Apr; 29(2):228-236. PubMed ID: 32718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.
    Schulz-Schüpke S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Ibrahim T; Linhardt M; Haas K; Hoppe K; Böttiger C; Groha P; Bradaric C; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Ott I; Goedel J; Byrne RA; Schneider S; Burgdorf C; Morath T; Kufner S; Joner M; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Hengstenberg C; Pache J; Fusaro M; Massberg S; Mehilli J; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
    JAMA; 2014 Nov; 312(19):1981-7. PubMed ID: 25399273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomised comparison of manual compression and FemoSeal™ vascular closure device for closure after femoral artery access coronary angiography: the CLOSure dEvices Used in everyday Practice (CLOSE-UP) study.
    Holm NR; Sindberg B; Schou M; Maeng M; Kaltoft A; Bøttcher M; Krusell LR; Hjort J; Thuesen L; Terkelsen CJ; Christiansen EH; Bøtker HE; Kristensen SD; Lassen JF;
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24603054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.