BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25599932)

  • 1. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 25599932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploration of analysis methods for diagnostic imaging tests: problems with ROC AUC and confidence scores in CT colonography.
    Mallett S; Halligan S; Collins GS; Altman DG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e107633. PubMed ID: 25353643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reporting.
    Dendumrongsup T; Plumb AA; Halligan S; Fanshawe TR; Altman DG; Mallett S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116018. PubMed ID: 25541977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
    Obuchowski NA
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new concordant partial AUC and partial c statistic for imbalanced data in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms.
    Carrington AM; Fieguth PW; Qazi H; Holzinger A; Chen HH; Mayr F; Manuel DG
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jan; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 31906931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The average receiver operating characteristic curve in multireader multicase imaging studies.
    Chen W; Samuelson FW
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 87(1040):20140016. PubMed ID: 24884728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value.
    Çorbacıoğlu ŞK; Aksel G
    Turk J Emerg Med; 2023; 23(4):195-198. PubMed ID: 38024184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the area under an ROC curve a valid measure of the performance of a screening or diagnostic test?
    Wald NJ; Bestwick JP
    J Med Screen; 2014 Mar; 21(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 24407586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint hypothesis testing of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Youden index.
    Yin J; Mutiso F; Tian L
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):657-674. PubMed ID: 33511784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small area estimation of receiver operating characteristic curves for ordinal data under stochastic ordering.
    Jang EJ; Nandram B; Ko Y; Kim DH
    Stat Med; 2020 May; 39(10):1514-1528. PubMed ID: 32017182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):528-541. PubMed ID: 25228637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical meaning of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve for the evaluation of the performance of disease markers.
    Parodi S; Verda D; Bagnasco F; Muselli M
    Epidemiol Health; 2022; 44():e2022088. PubMed ID: 36265519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.
    Dachman AH; Obuchowski NA; Hoffmeister JW; Hinshaw JL; Frew MI; Winter TC; Van Uitert RL; Periaswamy S; Summers RM; Hillman BJ
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):827-35. PubMed ID: 20663975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population.
    Taylor SA; Greenhalgh R; Ilangovan R; Tam E; Sahni VA; Burling D; Zhang J; Bassett P; Pickhardt PJ; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 18292478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of optimal operating points.
    Halpern EJ; Albert M; Krieger AM; Metz CE; Maidment AD
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Mar; 3(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 8796672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers to assess lung consolidation in calves with induced bacterial pneumonia using receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Martin M; Kleinhenz MD; Montgomery SR; Blasi DA; Almes KM; Baysinger AK; Coetzee JF
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34919697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Receiver operating characteristic analysis under tree orderings of disease classes.
    Wang D; Attwood K; Tian L
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1907-26. PubMed ID: 26678355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.