BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25601005)

  • 1. Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.
    Wang H; Sun P; Ip C; Zhao X; Fu S
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():75-84. PubMed ID: 25601005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial attention modulates the temporal sequence of hemispheric asymmetry in configural and featural face processing.
    Wang H; Fu S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():269-275. PubMed ID: 29374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological evidence of facial inversion with rapid serial visual presentation.
    Luo W; He W; Yang S; Feng W; Chen T; Wang L; Gan T; Luo YJ
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):395-402. PubMed ID: 23254280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inverted, Upright, and Blurred Faces Are Not Immune to the Attentional Blink.
    Eagles S; Murphy K
    Perception; 2016 Aug; 45(8):893-909. PubMed ID: 27060179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel BCI based on ERP components sensitive to configural processing of human faces.
    Zhang Y; Zhao Q; Jin J; Wang X; Cichocki A
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Apr; 9(2):026018. PubMed ID: 22414683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of facial color and inversion on the N170 event-related potential (ERP) component.
    Minami T; Nakajima K; Changvisommid L; Nakauchi S
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 311():341-8. PubMed ID: 26477984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hyperthermia exposure impaired the early stage of face recognition: an ERP study.
    Sun G; Li M; Yang Z; Li L; Jiang Q; Zhao L
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2012; 28(7):605-20. PubMed ID: 23017061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial Mechanisms within the Dorsal Visual Pathway Contribute to the Configural Processing of Faces.
    Zachariou V; Nikas CV; Safiullah ZN; Gotts SJ; Ungerleider LG
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Aug; 27(8):4124-4138. PubMed ID: 27522076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Later but not early stages of familiar face recognition depend strongly on attentional resources: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Wiese H; Ingram BT; Elley ML; Tüttenberg SC; Burton AM; Young AW
    Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():147-158. PubMed ID: 31310964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The attentional blink reveals serial working memory encoding: evidence from virtual and human event-related potentials.
    Craston P; Wyble B; Chennu S; Bowman H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):550-66. PubMed ID: 18564042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face Context Influences Local Part Processing: An ERP Study.
    Zhang H; Sun Y; Zhao L
    Perception; 2017 Sep; 46(9):1090-1104. PubMed ID: 28152650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.
    Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional modulation of early ERP components in response to faces: evidence from the attentional blink paradigm.
    Darque A; Del Zotto M; Khateb A; Pegna AJ
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Apr; 25(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 21858700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Featural and configural face processing differentially modulate ERP components.
    Mercure E; Dick F; Johnson MH
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():162-70. PubMed ID: 18722354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different underlying mechanisms for face emotion and gender processing during feature-selective attention: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Wang H; Ip C; Fu S; Sun P
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():306-313. PubMed ID: 28322907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.