1651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25601350)
21. Comparison of two cohorts of women who expulsed either a copper-intrauterine device or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Simonatto P; Bahamondes MV; Fernandes A; Silveira C; Bahamondes L
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 May; 42(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 26817571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A risk-benefit assessment of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Sturridge F; Guillebaud J
Drug Saf; 1996 Dec; 15(6):430-40. PubMed ID: 8968696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hormonal intrauterine devices.
Rybo G; Andersson K; Odlind V
Ann Med; 1993 Apr; 25(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 8489751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relative Risk of Cervical Neoplasms Among Copper and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Users.
Spotnitz ME; Natarajan K; Ryan PB; Westhoff CL
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 135(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 31923062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Weight variation in users of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a copper intrauterine device for up to ten years of use.
Modesto W; de Nazaré Silva dos Santos P; Correia VM; Borges L; Bahamondes L
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2015 Feb; 20(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 25160484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rates and outcomes of planned pregnancy after use of Norplant capsules, Norplant II rods, or levonorgestrel-releasing or copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz S; Pavéz M; Alvarez F; Brache V; Mishell DR; Lacarra M; McCarthy T; Holma P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Apr; 166(4):1208-13. PubMed ID: 1566771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls.
Bahamondes L; Brache V; Meirik O; Ali M; Habib N; Landoulsi S;
Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2527-38. PubMed ID: 26409014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perforation risk and intra-uterine devices: results of the EURAS-IUD 5-year extension study.
Barnett C; Moehner S; Do Minh T; Heinemann K
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2017 Dec; 22(6):424-428. PubMed ID: 29322856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of intensive versus non-intensive counselling on discontinuation rates due to bleeding disturbances of three long-acting reversible contraceptives.
Modesto W; Bahamondes MV; Bahamondes L
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 24812309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Non-hormonal and hormonal intrauterine contraception: survey of patients' perceptions in four Latin American countries.
Silva-Filho AL; Lira J; Rocha AL; Ferreira MC; Lamaita RM; Cândido EB; Carneiro MM
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Jun; 21(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 26848851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Weight variation in users of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, of the copper IUD and of medroxyprogesterone acetate in Brazil].
Yela DA; Monteiro IM; Bahamondes LG; Del Castillo S; Bahamondes MV; Fernandes A
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2006; 52(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 16622536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Attitudes of Israeli gynecologists towards the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: a questionnaire survey.
Ben-Haroush A; Oron G; Yogev Y; Yeshaya A; Kaplan B
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2004 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 15352692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Five years' experience with levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs.
Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Haukkamaa M; Lähteenmäki P; Nilsson CG; Toivonen J
Contraception; 1986 Feb; 33(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 3084167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.
Jatlaoui TC; Riley HEM; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 27771475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intrauterine devices and intrauterine systems.
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Hum Reprod Update; 2008; 14(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 18400840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European multicenter study.
Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Haukkamaa M; Holma P; Pyörälä T; Terho J; Toivonen J; Batar I; Lampe L; Andersson K
Contraception; 1987 Aug; 36(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 3123132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sexual functioning in women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems as compared to copper intrauterine devices.
Enzlin P; Weyers S; Janssens D; Poppe W; Eelen C; Pazmany E; Elaut E; Amy JJ
J Sex Med; 2012 Apr; 9(4):1065-73. PubMed ID: 21492401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Profiles of copper intrauterine devices and levonorgestrel intrauterine systems users in France in 2019: A national observational population-based study.
Roland N; Baricault B; Dray-Spira R; Weill A; Duranteau L; Zureik M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Feb; 160(2):594-603. PubMed ID: 36066002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Acceptability of intrauterine contraception among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a randomised clinical trial.
Kakaire O; Tumwesigye NM; Byamugisha JK; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2016 Jun; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 26895345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
