138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25602410)
1. Evaluation of the hooghoudt and kirkham tile drain equations in the soil and water assessment tool to simulate tile flow and nitrate-nitrogen.
Moriasi DN; Gowda PH; Arnold JG; Mulla DJ; Ale S; Steiner JL; Tomer MD
J Environ Qual; 2013 Nov; 42(6):1699-710. PubMed ID: 25602410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving nitrate load simulation of the SWAT model in an extensively tile-drained watershed.
Kim J; Her Y; Bhattarai R; Jeong H
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 904():166331. PubMed ID: 37595899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water quality modeling of fertilizer management impacts on nitrate losses in tile drains at the field scale.
Nangia V; Gowda PH; Mulla DJ; Sands GR
J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(2):296-307. PubMed ID: 18268291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling and assessing water and nutrient balances in a tile-drained agricultural watershed in the U.S. Corn Belt.
Ren D; Engel B; Mercado JAV; Guo T; Liu Y; Huang G
Water Res; 2022 Feb; 210():117976. PubMed ID: 34953214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of simulated strategies for reducing nitrate-nitrogen losses through subsurface drainage systems.
Ale S; Bowling LC; Youssef MA; Brouder SM
J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(1):217-28. PubMed ID: 22218190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling riverine nitrate export from an East-Central Illinois watershed using SWAT.
Hu X; McIsaac GF; David MB; Louwers CA
J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(4):996-1005. PubMed ID: 17526878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EPIC tile flow and nitrate loss predictions for three Minnesota cropping systems.
Chung SW; Gassman PW; Huggins DR; Randall GW
J Environ Qual; 2001; 30(3):822-30. PubMed ID: 11401271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of bioenergy crop growth and the impacts of bioenergy crops on streamflow, tile drain flow and nutrient losses in an extensively tile-drained watershed using SWAT.
Guo T; Cibin R; Chaubey I; Gitau M; Arnold JG; Srinivasan R; Kiniry JR; Engel BA
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Feb; 613-614():724-735. PubMed ID: 28938215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving model capability in simulating spatiotemporal variations and flow contributions of nitrate export in tile-drained catchments.
Cao P; Lu C; Crumpton W; Helmers M; Green D; Stenback G
Water Res; 2023 Oct; 244():120489. PubMed ID: 37651862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applicability of models to predict phosphorus losses in drained fields: a review.
Radcliffe DE; Reid DK; Blombäck K; Bolster CH; Collick AS; Easton ZM; Francesconi W; Fuka DR; Johnsson H; King K; Larsbo M; Youssef MA; Mulkey AS; Nelson NO; Persson K; Ramirez-Avila JJ; Schmieder F; Smith DR
J Environ Qual; 2015 Mar; 44(2):614-28. PubMed ID: 26023980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In situ bioreactors and deep drain-pipe installation to reduce nitrate losses in artificially drained fields.
Jaynes DB; Kaspar TC; Moorman TB; Parkin TB
J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 18268306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Crop growth, hydrology, and water quality dynamics in agricultural fields across the Western Lake Erie Basin: Multi-site verification of the Nutrient Tracking Tool (NTT).
Guo T; Confesor R; Saleh A; King K
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jul; 726():138485. PubMed ID: 32315850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison and evaluation of model structures for the simulation of pollution fluxes in a tile-drained river basin.
Hoang L; van Griensven A; van der Keur P; Refsgaard JC; Troldborg L; Nilsson B; Mynett A
J Environ Qual; 2014 Jan; 43(1):86-99. PubMed ID: 25602543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Managing tile drainage, subirrigation, and nitrogen fertilization to enhance crop yields and reduce nitrate loss.
Drury CF; Tan CS; Reynolds WD; Welacky TW; Oloya TO; Gaynor JD
J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(3):1193-204. PubMed ID: 19398517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling Agricultural Watersheds with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): Calibration and Validation with a Novel Procedure for Spatially Explicit HRUs.
Teshager AD; Gassman PW; Secchi S; Schoof JT; Misgna G
Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 57(4):894-911. PubMed ID: 26616430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SWAT-CS(enm): Enhancing SWAT nitrate module for a Canadian Shield catchment.
Zhang D; Chen X; Yao H
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Apr; 550():598-610. PubMed ID: 26849324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Crop improvement influences on water quantity and quality processes in an agricultural watershed.
Ren D; Engel B; Tuinstra MR
Water Res; 2022 Jun; 217():118353. PubMed ID: 35405549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the contribution of subsurface drainage to watershed water yield using SWAT+ with groundwater modeling.
Bailey RT; Bieger K; Flores L; Tomer M
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 802():149962. PubMed ID: 34781586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying the contribution of tile drainage to basin-scale water yield using analytical and numerical models.
Schilling KE; Gassman PW; Arenas-Amado A; Jones CS; Arnold J
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():297-309. PubMed ID: 30543979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiyear nutrient removal performance of three constructed wetlands intercepting tile drain flows from grazed pastures.
Tanner CC; Sukias JP
J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(2):620-33. PubMed ID: 21520769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
