These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. More of me! Distinguishing self and reward bias using redundancy gains. Sui J; Humphreys GW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2549-61. PubMed ID: 26265319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Generalizations of the race model inequality. Gondan M; Blurton SP Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):95-122. PubMed ID: 23713201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A tutorial on testing the race model inequality. Gondan M; Minakata K Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):723-35. PubMed ID: 26637234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The interaction between self-bias and reward: Evidence for common and distinct processes. Sui J; Humphreys GW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):1952-64. PubMed ID: 25851057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self and team prioritisation effects in perceptual matching: Evidence for a shared representation. Enock F; Sui J; Hewstone M; Humphreys GW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():107-118. PubMed ID: 29156368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A permutation test for the race model inequality. Gondan M Behav Res Methods; 2010 Feb; 42(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20160282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Negative mood disrupts self- and reward-biases in perceptual matching. Sui J; Ohrling E; Humphreys GW Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1438-48. PubMed ID: 26848876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The race model inequality: interpreting a geometric measure of the amount of violation. Colonius H; Diederich A Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 16478305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic biases and Type I error accumulation in tests of the race model inequality. Kiesel A; Miller J; Ulrich R Behav Res Methods; 2007 Aug; 39(3):539-51. PubMed ID: 17958166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing the race model inequality in redundant stimuli with variable onset asynchrony. Gondan M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):575-9. PubMed ID: 19331509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: the problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency. Mordkoff JT; Miller J Percept Psychophys; 1993 May; 53(5):527-35. PubMed ID: 8332422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual effects of social salience: evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Sui J; He X; Humphreys GW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1105-17. PubMed ID: 22963229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Showing that the race model inequality is not violated. Gondan M; Riehl V; Blurton SP Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 21858603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Composite faces are not processed holistically: evidence from the Garner and redundant target paradigms. Fitousi D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):2037-60. PubMed ID: 25925281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Redundant visual signals reduce the intensity of alcohol impairment. D'Agostino AR; Brown J; Fillmore MT Drug Alcohol Depend; 2020 Apr; 209():107945. PubMed ID: 32151879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]