These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25603167)
21. How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics. Lassiter D; Goodman ND Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():123-34. PubMed ID: 25497521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Considering too few alternatives: The mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Chevalley T; Schaeken W Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):728-51. PubMed ID: 26046814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Probabilistic conditional reasoning: Disentangling form and content with the dual-source model. Singmann H; Klauer KC; Beller S Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():61-87. PubMed ID: 27416493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Popper and the problem of induction in epidemiology]. Banegas JR; RodrÃguez Artalejo F; del Rey Calero J Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 11031841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies. Cohen AL; Staub A Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty. Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. Heit E; Rotello CM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Judging the Probability of Hypotheses Versus the Impact of Evidence: Which Form of Inductive Inference Is More Accurate and Time-Consistent? Tentori K; Chater N; Crupi V Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):758-78. PubMed ID: 26100936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias. Trippas D; Thompson VA; Handley SJ Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 28028779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The suppression of q card selections: evidence for deductive inference in Wason's selection task. Feeney A; Handley SJ Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):1224-42. PubMed ID: 11131821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process. Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Ngo J; Dunn JC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1333-1351. PubMed ID: 29389195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Suppression of valid inferences and knowledge structures: the curious effect of producing alternative antecedents on reasoning with causal conditionals. Markovits H; Potvin F Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):736-44. PubMed ID: 11531228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Conservative forgetful scholars: How people learn causal structure through sequences of interventions. Bramley NR; Lagnado DA; Speekenbrink M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):708-31. PubMed ID: 25329086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning. Rotello CM; Heit E J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A description-experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups. Schulze C; Hertwig R Cognition; 2021 May; 210():104580. PubMed ID: 33667974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of explanatory considerations in updating. Douven I; Schupbach JN Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():299-311. PubMed ID: 26069937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]